Where are we Headed?

Sugar snow snakes through the forested highland crevices like frothy white streams flowing toward their summer delta as sugar shacks exhale plumes of steam dotting the horizon from damp pockets. Below, remnants of winter can be seen along the stream’s bank and the house’s northern perimeter; also where the plow has left the most impure mounds. When they vanish, curled clumps of ugly sodden turf will remain, peeled from the lawn like skin from a potato. Spring has sprung on the Berkshire base.

As I sat in my truck in an upland hayfield, freezing rain drumming softly on the roof, dogs romping uninhibited toward a spring hole covered with punky floating ice, I was thinking about the sweet sap of the sugar bush surrounding me. Would it still run sweet for my grandson’s grandson? Or would fertile sugar maples follow the path of the Atlantic salmon out of southern New England north to more suitable climes? It’s a question worth asking; one the corporations and the politicians protecting them don’t want asked, but still worth asking, and asking, and asking again until their ears ring like a  target-range grunt’s.

And what of our native, speckled brook trout, most vulnerable to the airborne waste of Midwestern smokestacks, the same waste contributing to the warming issue along with our gas-guzzling belches? Where will our brookies flee when the local streams are too acidic to support them? Ever think of that?

Just a couple of random thoughts on a cold, rainy spring morn; subversive thoughts at that; spring-spawned food for thought.

Is it wise to ignore the rape of our environment in the name of prosperity and Wall Street greed? That’s the question I was asking before exiting my truck, whistling the dogs back and heading home.

And here I sit, still pondering.

Sixties Rant

”Will you still bleed me, will you still mislead me,

When I’m sixty-four?”

Paul McCartney

(lyrics slightly altered to fit theme)

What do Sgt. Pepper and hippie freaks, neocons and fundamentalist Christian nutbags have to do with declining Atlantic salmon numbers? Just you wait and see. There is a connection.

Trust me.

As for salmon, well, it seems like the more you read, the bleaker the restoration picture becomes. A fact, sad but true. And we’re not talking about the Connecticut River here, or even the Northeast for that matter. No, we’re focusing on the realistic possibility of Atlantic salmon extinction on planet Earth. In fact, the trend toward extinction could already be irreversible, thanks to human interference that began with dams and log drives, moved to industrialization and advanced commercial marine fishing methods, and has now introduced a death-knell known as aquaculture, or high-seas fish farming. Any of the above factors alone could have spelled eventual doom for salmon and other coldwater fish that seek pristine freshwater streams; lumped together they’re insurmountable, probably imminent.

Of course, you’ll never hear such a pessimistic assessment from the shepherds of restoration projects like the one on the Connecticut River, nor should you expect to, despite an 80 percent North American salmon decline since 1970. Their mission is to reverse the extinction process, and it’s a noble plight at that, one for which they should be saluted. But, unfortunately, conservation has little chance of succeeding in a culture of greed that dismisses global warming and acid rain as schemes of the pointy-headed, Eastern, tree-hugging, liberal elite in one breath, and attempts to legislate a ban on public-school evolution curriculum in the next. Some call it progress, others lunacy. Count me among the latter, even though I admit I’m ”out of touch” following two elections that placed rapists and plunderers in charge of the environment and Wall Street in charge of the Pentagon. Who from the Sgt. Pepper generation would have thunk it in their wildest dreams?

Horrifying!

We all know the threadbare excuse that goes back to the Magna Carta, when the world was still flat. It goes something like this: ”OK, son, I readily admit the president is a world-class embarrassment, but you should see how our General Dynamics stock has soared.”

Yeah, right! I guess that’s one way of justifying the nightmare called Bush 43. The old money and the new prophets are in a state of euphoria; them and the khaki College Republicans, every hair in place, spewing their self-righteous noise 24/7 on the tube and in the airwaves. Remember that old graffiti proclaiming ”God is Dead!” on bridge abutments and urban walls? Forget about it. He’s been resurrected with a vengeance and a Southern accent better than Hillary could ever feign. But me, I’m off on another tangent at this moment, having just returned from a trip to the sound system behind me.

You see, having mentioned Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, the classic Beatles album that recently celebrated its 40th birthday, I decided to give it a spin on my sound system. Of course it’s loud! Absolutely! Is there any other way to listen to Sarge? If you don’t like it, leave! That’s my position, because everything was loud back then, in 1967, nothing more so than the defiant shouts in the streets for racial equality, Flower Power and an end to the Vietnam War.

Predictably, the Windsor-knot Spartans won that battle. Don’t they always win? And now here we sit, teetering upon the WWIII ledge, mired in a flashback foreign fiasco by a petulant preppy brat who cheered the troops during the Yale demonstrations he witnessed, drank and drugged himself silly after earning his Ivy MBA, loafed from one crony Lone Star job to the next, purchased an American League team with idle income, and became Texas governor. It gets better. After allegedly being elected president, Dubya had the audacity to bring along a vindictive retinue from the disgraced Nixon Administration for a gluttonous joyride in capitalist greed and corruption.

Talk about payback. Who could have ever imagined it? Could it be worse? We’re being governed by an intellectually inferior Nixon clone who rose to power on updrafts from Evangelical gasbags and the highest court in the land. If you thought it only happened in movies, or long ago in Italy, Germany and Spain, think again. So it’s high time to put down Tim LaHaye and start rereading Hemingway and Silone before we are all truly ”left behind.”

Back in the idealistic Sgt. Pepper era there were many who believed hippies flipping out to Jerry, Jimi, Janis and Gracie at Golden Gate Park were a threat to our national security. Imagine that: ”peaceniks” advocating conservation, communal living, free-love, natural foods, and human dignity; protesters swarming the streets to halt racism and shake the military-industrial complex off its monorail to nuclear destruction … a threat to Western Civilization? I don’t think so, no matter what Bill O’Reilly and other Fox Noise bullies shout over opponents. Now we call it news, fair and balanced no less; years ago it was Pravda.

Today, those ”deranged, longhair commies” of the Sixties remain among us, hurting no one, content to stake their claims in the hills. They make pottery, blow glass, cultivate salubrious fruits and vegetables, read Thoreau and Nearing, Zinn and Chomsky by the woodstove — maybe even Hunter S. Thompson with a shot of Jack in the back parlor — shaking their heads in dismay at the suicidal path we chose after the racist Dixiecrats and chauvinistic, pro-hardline-Israel liberals switched sides in ’68.

Since that political line of demarcation was excavated into the political landscape by the infamous 1968 Democratic Convention, the Chicago 7 horror show, Dr. Spock, and the Six-Day War in the Middle East, our dramatic Atlantic salmon decline is a symbol of the selfish nation we’ve become. So let’s hope the Petulant Preppy Brat represents the historical apex of this dreadful, Sixties-borne, ”Silent Majority” experiment — a sharp, reactionary right turn away from ”Flower Children,” whose altruistic attempt to shake us from our destructive, imperialistic insanity ricocheted in the opposite direction.

If we don’t soon bang a tight U-ie, salmon haven’t a prayer.

Hunting Buddies Never Die

I wish I had known, been able to reach out. But now he’s gone, too late to say goodbye.

I remember the last time we spoke. It was brief, on my way into the Green River Festival a couple of years ago. His welcoming smile and warm brown eyes, same mischievous glint, were unchanged since our pheasant-hunting days. Back then, he’d pull into my South Deerfield yard in his blue Honda Accord at 8:30 sharp each Wednesday morning. He’d step inside to briefly greet my wife, readying for work, before we’d depart for a wetland romp somewhere along the Hopewell basin, or maybe Fuller’s Swamp or the Bashin, sometimes all three for a robust four- or five-hour hunt behind Sara, my Lab, then Pepper, my first Springer. His enthusiasm was contagious, blatant joie de vivre, always eager. I’d choose the coverts and handle the dog, pursuing flushes while vocally positioning my buddy for shots along the edges. To his benefit, he was often in a better place than I. Great fun and teamwork, like Flatt & Scruggs, Garcia & Grisman, harmonious swamp-busting to the tune of lively banter — men’s talk, sometimes raunchy, flavoring our thorny, mud-splattered maneuvers. He was all man, with a feminine kindness; all doctor with a nurse’s compassion. Not my doctor. A friend.

Unfortunately, our paths had parted in recent years, since my move to Greenfield. When my wife bumped into him, she always remarked how friendly and genuine he was, a good man to the core. We didn’t know he’d been sick since October, were unaware of the treatments aimed at his evil foe. A private man, he probably didn’t want people to know, hoped to be spared the indignity of shallow coffee-shop gossip. Mercifully, it didn’t last long. Bruce Van Boeckel, a first-class internist who helped build the local hospice center to assure dignified death for others, passed away Friday peacefully, his way, at he and wife Terry’s wooded Leverett home. Always a picture of health, Bruce loved life and his work, was vigorous, brilliant and handsome, full of life and charm. Had everything going for him, and didn’t see 57. It isn’t fair. Too young. Too much to offer. Why Bruce?

Couldn’t his aggressive cancer have attacked someone who wanted out, had little to live for, suicidal demons tugging at his strings; someone cold, hungry and hopeless? But that’s me talking, not Bruce. He likely accepted it as a bad hand dealt, with no choice but to play it out. No stranger to mortality, he had often seen the sinister smirk of terminal illness, then was consumed by it. No escape, no chance, a cruel irony. He knew the signs and symptoms, the idiosyncrasies, and it still took him. What chance for you or me? None. A frightening reality. Terrifying.

We met back in the ’80s, a few years after he settled here. I was at work. The phone rang. It was Bruce. A New York City native, he read my column and hoped I would introduce him to the bird-hunting game. He had sharpened his wing-shooting skills at a sportsmen’s club and a hunting preserve, was ready for the real thing. I asked when he was available. Wednesday was his day off. An odd couple had been forged, he high-achieving and credentialed — Yale and Harvard no less — I from the school of hard knocks, independent, a rebel. Our friendship blossomed fragrantly and bore succulent fruit that amiably withered after a decade. We even traipsed off to Sodus Point for Lake Ontario fishing trips, to the Rangeley Lakes for a New England Outdoor Writers Association safari, bass-boat I helped him select in tow. Hauling that boat, four men and their luggage up the long hill to Springfield, Vt., my Cherokee’s thermostat went kaput, requiring a hot, steamy pit stop. We got through it, though, and fished western Maine for an uneventful, three-day, May weekend. No problem, just hit it wrong. Everyone struggled. But that didn’t stop Bruce from trying. Patience was one of his many virtues, that and diligence, along with his ability to communicate, meet people, pick their brains. Determined to catch landlocked salmon and trout that weekend, he chewed ears, absorbed many tips and tried most, all for naught. He used to fanaticize back then that he’d retire at 50, buy a charter boat and take others fishing. It never happened. Perhaps it would have in time. We’ll never know. His time ran out. Tragedy in its purest form. He would have been a good captain, or anything else he put his mind to. Believe it.

A rare find, Bruce was for me a unique hunting companion I won’t forget. We were the same age, grew up during the Sixties and connected on many philosophical issues. The man was a scientist, a researcher, and his Ivy League education trained him how to find information. I was a component of that exercise, helping to satisfy his hunger for local history, his fertile mind rich as the bottomland soil we trudged. He was always fascinated with stories about the roads or trails we traveled, a swamp or upland meadow we were hunting; loved the folklore, the vernacular, the quaint upland graveyards, their tidy stonewalls. His curiosity, intellect and zeal for discovery was infectious. You could feel it in his kind brown eyes, deep as an oily sinkhole. He wanted to learn the turf, and I was a teacher. The payback was friendship and occasional medical guidance. The few times I asked for advice, he was there for me, happy to help. He even once examined me, gratis, at his Connecticut River Internists office. I was concerned about something, a false alarm. He told me to come in before lunch, he’d take a look. It tells you a lot about the man.

It hurt a little when Bruce called me before bird-hunting season more than decade ago to disclose that he was a fisherman, not a hunter. Although he loved the physical trials and camaraderie of bird hunting, he had lost his stomach for killing. I understood, respected his candor. A philosophical dilemma had swung him. The doctor committed to saving people was having trouble justifying the kill. He didn’t need the meat, and preferred fishing, which allowed him to release what he caught. He asked why I had stopped fishing, said he would like to rekindle my interest. We could fish together, continue our sporting bond and devilish banter. I told him my schedule had changed, that if I couldn’t be on the stream before the birds sang, I wasn’t interested. The only suitable alternative was dusk, which my job also precluded. I’d rather clean my kennel than fish at midday. He understood. It was too bad. Maybe someday we would reconnect.

As it turned out, that day never came. It wasn’t meant to be. But does it matter? Hardly. Friendship survives until you’re both gone. Now I’m the sole perpetuator. I will never forget Bruce, the way he dropped into my life, gave me laughs and companionship. He’ll always have sanctuary in my soul. And while I don’t believe we’ll ever meet again in some heavenly kingdom, I’m grateful for the time we had here, however brief.

Still, I do regret that the word never reached me, that I missed my chance to meet eyes, embrace, laugh about the good times, shake farewell? I guess in my own way I’ve done that now. I can feel his presence. I pray he’s listening. He was good at it.

Better than I.

Solitary Contentment

Published: Thursday, January 01, 2009

It’s all coming back to me as I sit at my desk, space heater purring behind me, dog sleeping between it and me, noble, 9-point buck mounted above, between the windows. A steady rain splatters off the stone terrace outside as mellow gray light from the dense foggy air filters through sheers. Dry-docked, I’m thinking back, trying to make sense of a deer hunt on the first Saturday. It typified a fruitless season. Why do men hunt? That’s the question I’m pondering. Better still, why do I?

Posted high on a Colrain ridge behind an apple orchard that morning, I can still in my mind’s eye see that faint orange sunrise peeking over the eastern horizon, one that eventually cast a warm glow through openings in the cold, silent December forest. A hospitable hue, it bled through the mixed woods, a glint illuminating a tiny spot on a half-inch stick partially buried in brittle, bronze oak leaves two paces from my right boot. At first I believed it was a surveyor’s mark but couldn’t imagine it had escaped me the previous day. So I studied the brilliant orange patch, all eyes, careful not to move my head, and was convinced it was, indeed, the remnant of an old survey. Then the sun slid south and it vanished like frost from Guilford slate. Amazing, I remember thinking, the intensity a sliver of first light delivers. Then right back on task, sitting solitary and still, senses fine-tuned, awaiting a crack at salubrious winter venison.

I was nestled comfortably into a dip along a high, sturdy stonewall built by my ancestors, a realization that always brings a sense of comfort I’m grateful to comprehend in the quiet solitude of special places where my blood flows from spring holes. Makes you feel welcome. The location was selected based on many factors observed over the first five days of the shotgun season, the salient one being the nearby orchard, pungent with fermenting fruit in tree and turf. Equally significant, it was the first place where I had found scarce acorns and fresh signs of deer digging for them. Everywhere else they had been cleaned up by the many creatures that eat them. Combine the available feed with knowledge that hunters had surrounded the place when I was elsewhere on opening day, and that I had seen a buck and doe run off during noontime reconnaissance the previous day, and I liked my chances of seeing deer either feeding back to their beds or pushed by hunters.

I figured I’d get in there early and see what happened, liking my chances better than anywhere else I had hunted, but aware that deer hunting is always a long shot. I can deal with that. Being an old hardball player, I long ago learned to accept defeat without succumbing to it. It is said that a baseball hitter must learn to quickly forget failure, that even Hall of Famers are unsuccessful 70 percent of the time. More disheartening is the ratio of swings to solid contact, clearly quantifying what you’re up against. Then when you realize that the odds of taking a good Franklin County buck are steeper, it all comes into bittersweet perspective steeped in pessimism … but worth the effort. Even the finest deer hunters, which I do not count myself among, would salivate at a one-in-10 shot. Even so, it never hurts to arrive at your stand with confidence, which I was oozing with that frosty morning.

I had parked my truck along the woods at the outflow of a snowmobile trail in a frozen, brush-hogged field, packed lightly, loaded my weapon and slowly walked 150 yards up the trail, bearing left where it bore right and angling uphill toward the stonewall I knew would soon be visible in scanty light. I intended to first find the wall, then the large twin oak rooted at its base and reaching in a V to the heavens from near my intended stand, situated some 100 yards behind the orchard. I had taken the same route the previous day when the two whitetails had slipped by out of range, and I knew, with the leaves underfoot in their noisiest, frozen state, that I would not get a pop walking in. The plan was to get there as quickly as possible and settle in before deer left the orchard. When I didn’t kick one out on the way in, step one of my mission was successful. Step two would be the tedious waiting game that’s all too seldom rewarded.

As I sat to greet the new day in warm, camo wool, Mossy Oak mask hiding my face, I was enchanted by the breathless dawn, not a sound anywhere, certain I could hear a mouse within 75 yards. My attention was focused south toward the orchard, carefully scanning for movement through spaces between trees and behind deadfalls, fully aware that even when you’re convinced you’ll hear deer, you often see them first. Still, my ears and eyes were equal partners as I entered into that otherworldly state of melting into the habitat, alert as its wild critters, hoping to be in the right place at the right time. I remember thinking then how sad it is that most people in our modern culture, my own boys included, don’t understand the joy of deer hunting’s silent, motionless observation. Hunting isn’t about power and blood lust to me. It’s about the game, matching wits with an elusive beast of superior senses on its turf. That’s what draws me to the cold, gray solitude; not killing, even though I know it may come to that.

Although it’s not always easy to drag yourself from a warm bed to the dark, chilling woods, once there it’s fulfilling, the air and anticipation, sights and sounds creating a stimulating natural symphony worthy of an urban chamber. Reduced to a cripple by a bum left knee from a competitive past, the woods, the fields and the bogs have become my last, perhaps best, playing field. There is none better. Nature and challenge the attractions; seared venison medallions the occasional reward.

There were no deer sightings that morning, just a few squirrels, red and gray, crashing through the leaves to pique my interest. I have learned to tolerate those pesky little critters, never totally ignoring their audible teases even when certain it’s not a deer. A presumed squirrel sometimes becomes a deer, so you learn to investigate and forgive. But more disturbing than the squirrelly racket that morning was the total absence of a gunshot anywhere, unimaginable a generation ago when men gravitated to the woods on days off. But with much of Colrain and parts of Shelburne, Leyden, Greenfield, Deerfield and maybe even Heath within earshot from my lofty perch that calm morning, not even a distant blast, no orange-clad hunters passing. Not what I expected.

Returning midmorning-inquisitive to my truck for the ride home, I decided to circle the area. Not a hunter anywhere. I was surprised even though it only reinforced what I already knew. A local tradition is dying. Gone are the days I recall waiting as a boy before and after school for hunters to pull into the downtown checking station. They’d cozy their trucks up to a scale dangling from a grotesque frame and the attendant would hook and hoist the dead animal off the ground by rope and pulley as observers tried to guess the weight. This occurred right in the town square, butted up against the busiest eatery in town, and no one found it distasteful enough to make a public clamor. Some undoubtedly pitied the deer, opposed the public display and disagreed with hunting itself, but they contained their venom, accepting hunting as the way it was, the way it always had been, the way it always would be. How mistaken they were. Those tolerant times have disappeared along with an innate understanding of the subsistence farms owned by friends, relatives and neighbors. Back then, we all understood where our meat, milk and eggs, our boots, gloves and winter woolens came from. Most of us even knew the thump and flapping at the henhouse chopping-block. Not today. No, a troubling disconnect is now prevalent and directly related to the shrill anti-hunting outcry, not to mention the suburban affliction referred to by fancy-pants therapists as ”nature-deficiency disorder” — a catchy phrase indeed; sad, too, because it’s an American epidemic.

You wonder where it will all lead. Then again, who cares? It seems that those who know the least shriek the loudest, gathering frothy support along the way. So what can hunters, vastly misunderstood and outnumbered, possibly do other than turn a deaf ear and carry on? Sadly, that’s what it’s come to, even in our own quaint, muddy hilltowns, long ago yuppified.

The rooted few just can’t give in. We know swimming against the current only makes us stronger.

Wiser, too.

The Painter

The sad news was fresh, the morning gray. I was backed up to a bluff overlooking the Green River, sitting on my tailgate, sipping coffee, watching my dogs romp up and down the bank, swimming after mallards, flushing them, returning to the plateau, shaking off, bounding through the shin-high hayfield … pure joy. My imagination soared with their enthusiasm, evaporating to another realm, surreal.

It was cool, audible north wind blustery, cherry tree bowed, leaning toward the river, bobbing like the stroke of a careful painter. Yes, exactly, a painter, ”John the Painter,” at least that’s how he always identified himself to me on the phone. His name was John McAulay, a gentle, honest man who became part of my family for five summers, van parked out front, paint-splattered portable radio, coat-hanger antenna, tuned to oldies as he applied paint, three coats, to every inch of my dwelling and outbuildings, 76 shutters — a daunting task for a crew, never mind one man, even overwhelming if you let it consume you. But John never got discouraged, just kept a steady pace, watched the weather reports and kept at it, avoiding rain and humidity like the swine flu.

Five years later, he stood back and admired his work, done the right way, his way: conscientious to a fault, ethical to the core, a rare bird in the world of painting. John was a transient who just tried to blend in, be it in your backyard or at the local coffee shop, a quiet, even dignified presence, almost Native American in disposition; pensive, reserved. And now the man, a dying breed, is dead. His heart gave out at a Greenfield laundromat; evening, took him by surprise, quick, the way he would have scripted it.

The news arrived by phone, his cell, around 9 a.m. last Thursday. On my way out the door to run the dogs, my phone rang, caller ID reading ”Greenfield 775-2385.” The number looked familiar so I picked it up. It was John’s nephew, hesitation in his voice, delivering the news that John had passed to a member of his thin speed-dial directory. We spoke for 10 or 15 minutes, me offering my sympathies, telling him how much I liked John, reminiscing, but I guess it really didn’t hit me until I released my dogs in that spring-green hayfield and sat on the tailgate, right-wing WEEI garbage on the radio, peaceful, bucolic setting, precisely how John liked it. In fact, he often ”camped” a few miles upstream.

Maybe it was his spirit, traveling with the wind, the water, but it all started coming to me: his voice, his little gray mustache, his diffident, unassuming manner, healthy distrust of the government, society, religion. I never shared this with anyone, but I have fantasized that if ever I write a novel he would be a character, sort of an itinerant hired hand, akin to an 18th-century cabin boy who returns to the mainland and drifts from town to town, farm to farm, picking up odd jobs along the way, curling up in a hayloft for the night, saying little about his past or present, mysterious; more profound than expected once he opens the window into his past, shares his perspectives on life, the world.

There was a lot more to John than met the eye. I know. He trusted me, I him. I recommended him as a painter many times, always saying that I knew if I left $100 in change on my table and took off for the week, giving him free reign of my home, not a nickel would disappear. He had no religion, just country morals, Vermont ethics, a lonely piece of existential flotsam in the turbulent sea of life, floating, content.

Over the years, nearly 56 of them, many interesting characters have dropped in and out of my life. John the Painter was one. I often described him as an old-fashioned Vermont painter, hand-scraper and brush, a Springfield boy, good way about him. Married, two kids and a home, working the General Motors assembly line in Framingham into the 1970s, he decided it wasn’t for him and withdrew, selling out, settling-up with his wife, buying a full-sized van, and making it his mobile home, interior styled as a sea captain’s quarters. From that point on, he was the captain, did his own thing, totally; no one to tell him where to go or what to do; traveling the countryside, picking up odd jobs along the way, just enough to get by, didn’t need much to keep him happy. He called the day he sold his home and bought the van the best of his life, brought peace and freedom to his conflicted soul, broke the heavy chains trying to moor him to the mainstream. I guess it took him a while, but he finally figured out that he’d rather flee the Joneses than keep up with them. And escape he did, free as the Baltimore Oriole serenading from the river’s edge, aimless, a drifter, no itinerary, no maps, no directions, no time card or punch clock; blissful autonomy. Maybe he had it all figured out, a better way; just got sick of playing the game and softly threw his cards on the table. You have to respect a man for that; at least I do.

I will miss John’s visits, his calm manner, his wry wit, sly grin, a peculiar paranoia that the government was about to reel him into a place of no return. It was he who introduced me to rabble-rouser Alex Jones, the Illuminati and other demons from the conspiratorial fringe. I enjoyed listening to his rap, molded in Scott Nearing’s ’60s, Upton Sinclair’s ’20s. He was plenty different, counter-culture, bohemian, some would say crazy. But John was not insane, just eccentric. He was genuine as the Skitchewaug Mt. bedrock he once trudged with his Vermont-bear-hunting dad — a loner, non-conformist, always well-kempt, a speck of paint here and there; dumb like a fox, a gray fox.

I will not forget John, an interesting character who dropped out, stopped in and touched me like few others have.

He taught me something.

Chapman/Pierson highboy

Discovery is exciting, precisely what keeps people hunting through moldy cellars, dusty attics and decaying barns, yard sales and crack-of-dawn flea markets. Collecting’s a disease, one that can be highly contagious, a fever that grips you … which reminds me of a recent visit to my Greenfield, Ma., home, one that bore sweet, salubrious fruit, far from forbidden.

Historic Deerfield President Phil Zea, renowned furniture expert, stopped by to poke around a bit, check out a few things I’ve been trying to pin down around Old Tavern Farm. I’m talking about remnants: things like a peculiar, weathered bench, unpainted, crevassed grain; a flaky-red butter box; an amazing early board, 3×8, one piece, breadboard ends, prostrate on the filthy haymow; also other interesting boards stacked above, 16-feet long, two inches thick, cleated together, their original use a mystery. These items of interest have been on-site for a century or two. I find them captivating and figured Phil would, too. Plus, of course, such brainstorming sessions stimulate tavern talk, always welcome. Public houses were fascinating places, bustling with activity, and living in one has a spiritual texture.

It’s funny the way things evolve, how you often wind up on an unintended subject or tangent, which leads to something else and totally consumes you like a deep, black, greasy mudhole. This promised to be just such an occasion and was when our focus turned to a cherry, Queen Anne, flat-top, high chest of drawers in the dining room. I call it the Chapman/Pierson highboy, with a full provenance dating back before the Revolution in Saybrook/Killingworth, Ct. A dignified and graceful piece with a strong vertical thrust, it can stand on its own as an important piece of 18th century Americana. What enhances its value, though, is a hand-written chalk inscription on the inside of its backboard, above the waist and behind the bottom two drawers of the top section. There, a rare maker’s mark in large white script reads: “Killingworth October the 15th 1772, A Case of Drawers Made By John Chapman A Joinor [sic].” At some point, someone even attempted to trace over it with chalk, splicing in the word “when” above and between the words Drawers and Made, all part of its history now. Who knows when that was done? Who cares?

Chapman built the piece for the wedding of Rebecca Parmalee of Killingworth. She married, Jan. 7, 1773 in Killingworth, Samuel Pierson of the same town, he the grandson of Yale founder Abraham Pierson. Upon purchasing the piece a few years back, I immediately embarked on a discovery mission. I wanted to know more about the original owners, the maker and the provenance, all of which came together nicely thanks to a circa 1955 western New York newspaper article. But I wanted more, even what these people ate for breakfast if I could find it.

When I contacted Connecticut Valley furniture scholar and author Thomas P. Kugelman (“Connecticut Valley Furniture: Eliphalet Chapin and His Contemporaries, 1750-1800”), he had no knowledge of the joiner John Chapman. My inquiry and accompanying digital photos piqued his interest, though, and he promised he’d look into it when he got a chance. His follow-up arrived sooner than expected. Having researched state archives at the Connecticut Historical Society, he wrote that he was able to prove Chapman was a woodworker through his probate records. Chapman’s 1782 estate inventory listed “a sett of Joinours Tools” valued at 5 pounds, 3 shillings, no meager expense at the time.

Chapman (1731-82) was born and raised in Saybrook, Ct., which borders Killingworth and once spilled into it. Whether he ever lived in Killingworth itself, as the inscription seems to suggest, is unimportant, but son John did. Chapman descended from original Saybrook settler Robert Chapman, whose bloodlines ran throughout that region on both sides of the Connecticut River (Middlesex County on the west side, New London County on the east). Because Saybrook vital records place John Chapman there for his birth and death, it’s safe to say he was a Saybrook man. Also, Chapman is identified in deeds as a joiner from Saybrook’s “Ferry District.” The record of Chapman’s land transactions show several in Killingworth, including one with the Samuel Pierson associated with the high chest.

During the Zea visit, my final request, on a whim, was that he evaluate a blind dovetail centered on the back side of the highboy’s curvilinear skirt, where a drop once descended between two accentuated scallops. I wondered if he was familiar with drops attached separately by a long, vertical dovetail instead of cut out in the template. Yes, he had seen the design detail but said it was uncommon because of the precision required. Given the degree of difficulty, he leaned toward a fancy drop, perhaps a maritime motif like a fish, lobster or whale’s tail, instead of the common, simple turned drop. I welcomed this opinion because I too figured it had likely been a fish or lobster tail, all three being embellishments associated with New London County furniture of the period. Kugelman hadn’t agreed. He assumed it had been a simple turned drop. We may never know for certain, but it’ll surely remain a topic of conversation for years to come.

During general discussion, Zea and I discussed where and how I found the piece and why I chose it over others. The answer was simple. I had searched 10 years for a high chest similar in style to the one that had stood in my home from 1772-1836. That piece, made of maple and today painted black, has been in Deerfield’s PVMA furniture collection since 1876 and is known as the Mary Stebbins Hinsdale high chest. Stebbins, from Belchertown, was married Jan. 8, 1772 to the second Samuel Hinsdale to own my home. The high chest was part of her wedding outfit. It is strikingly similar to the Chapman/Pierson chest I discovered marooned in an upstart western New York shop, with the same “Wethersfield style” and nearly identical dimensions, a tall, slender, vertical thrust that was not easy to find in today’s market. I know. I tried.

My reason for choosing the piece jostled our conversation to a different realm, infinitely more interesting, and really got Phil’s wheels spinning. The reason was that he said he was very familiar with the Hinsdale high chest. In fact, he probably knows more about it than anyone, because he did much of the research. He knew it had a Greenfield provenance but never connected it to Old Tavern Farm, which seemed to intrigue him. Even more significant was the fact that he had attributed a Saybrook origin to the Stebbins/Hinsdale high chest. In his opinion, my piece and the one that once stood here were, “from the same bolt of cloth.”

Imagine that! Talk about coincidence. An arduous search for an elusive highboy resembling another that once stood in the same building turns up an example that may have been the handiwork of the same man, was at least influenced by work in same coastal Connecticut neighborhood. Although more research is obviously needed, it isn’t unlikely that the chalk information on my piece could lead to the cabinetmaker who crafted the PVMA chest.

What an exciting development; amazing, in fact. It all speaks to the importance of signed furniture to research. Is it not discoveries like this that make collecting fun, keep devotees aching for more? Yes, without a doubt.

Discovery can be mind-blowing when lucky. I can’ wait to dig and scratch a little more regarding this one.

Another skunk

What I didn’t write in my most recent column  because of space constraints was an incident that occurred the day before dog Bessie got sprayed by the backyard skunk I documented in print.

It was around 4 p.m. and I was running my three Springer Spaniels — Ringo, Lily and Bessie — in a neighboring hayfield along the western lip of the Green River, mid-Greenfield Meadows. The sun was out, perhaps 80 degrees, and I figured I’d take them through a bar-way and down to the riverbank in the lower level, a Christmas-tree farm.

I drove down a farm road about 200 yards and backed my truck up to within 20 feet of the bar-way before exiting and releasing the animals from their porta-kennels, Ringy first, then the two bitches. Ringy jumped down, trotted to the bar-way and lifted his leg on the railroad-tie fencepost as I released the bitches, who scampered out of their kennel and literally flew off the truck’s bed, disturbing the packed dirt upon landing and sprinting full-speed across a harrowed garden, all business, almost like they were fleeing something dangerous. What they were after I had no clue, but they were definitely pursuing something so I watched curiously as they burst into a healthy, green, red-clover field, shin-high, perhaps a month’s worth of growth.

The bitches, mother and daughter, were enthusiastic to say the least, clearly hunting in unison, bounding, quick changes of direction, scenting, similar to their routine when pursuing a game bird through dense cover. They must have smelled something from their kennel on the way through — either that or saw it — and were wasting no time searching. I figured it must have been the hen turkey and six poults I had seen a week or so earlier in the same field. They must have smelled them, I thought, and were hell-bent on flushing them into a riverside hardwood. So I let it play out before whistling them back, first Lily, then Bess, after I could see nothing was going to flush.

With Lily and Ringo at my side, Bessie was still riled up, bounding furiously through the clover, clearly on a mission. I hollered and whistled a few times to get her back. No luck. Then, finally, she acknowledged me, turned and sprinted back nearly as fast as she had left. Reunited, the four of us walked to the river, swam briefly and returned, work beckoning.

As I climbed over the gray, weathered, horizontal, 2-by-4 rail extending from midway up the right bar-way post, one leg at a time,  Bessie ran through and sprinted back where it had all begun earlier, in the clover field. Once there, it seemed instantaneous, she bound gracefully through the field, head high, quick turns, scenting. I figured why call her and make a scene? I’d just hop in the truck, drive toward her and she’d come without objection. I was right. She noticed me driving toward her, froze in a stately pose, dug her head into the clover and ran toward us. That’s when I noticed something in her mouth. It looked white. Hmmmm? What was it?

When she arrived at the truck, I could see it was a young skunk, limp and dead. No wonder I had gotten that sniff of skunk on the way down to the river. I thought a skunk had let lose down there for some reason, but what I was actually smelling was Bessie, maybe Lily, too. I just didn’t put it all together at the time. She and Lily had made quick work of that little skunk, poor thing, and Bessie had wrestled it free before Lily had returned to my call. Then, when Bessie decided to join us, she left the skunk behind. Upon our return to the truck, she went lickety-split to reclaim her trophy before Lily did.

When Bessie jumped up onto the truck’s bed, she held her prize high and proud before giving it to me. I made sure it wasn’t playing possum, grabbed it by the tail, pulled gently and took it before kenneling Bessie. Then I returned to the cab, opened the door, dangled the dead skunk through the window, inside out, started the truck, drove to the pavement, and tossed the dead critter into the roadside brush … presumed road-kill.

Finally, after weeks of nighttime torment by neighborhood skunks in their backyard kennel, Lily and Bessie got even. They killed the unfortunate critter in the clover patch, and Bessie was damn proud of it. Lily, too, I would guess.

Flagpole

The man from whom we bought this place, Lute Nims, then 82, now deceased, took me on a special trip to the barn, where he pointed out a faded, chalky-white, wooden flagpole laying along the three-foot wall overlooking the hay pit. The pole was impressive, something I was barely familiar with – a straight tapered tree, small branches stripped off, leaving pimples – extending nearly the full length of the wall, some 30 feet, perhaps eight inches thick at the broken-off base. “This is the flagpole,” he said, pointing under a pile of old wooden ladders resting in a 45-degree angle against the thigh-high wall. “I want to show you where it stood before it broke some years ago.”

We walked out of the barn and to the flagpole’s former place along the southern periphery of the yard, in a shallow depression behind two massive Japanese maples that shield the colonial home from the road, lending privacy from passersby when foliaged. Mr. Nims began walking around in baby steps, probing with his toes and looking down before stopping, pressing the toe of his right shoe down and saying, ‘”Here it is! See? Put your foot here and feel the hole. The base is still in there.”

I pressed down with my toes and felt it, perhaps an inch or two deep, jagged wooden base at the bottom. I knew Mr. Nims had brought me there to, in his dignified, gentle manner, encourage me to someday re-erect the proud old ship’s-mast of a flagpole, a survivor from the distant past, dating back to who knows when, definitely 19th century, perhaps earlier. A rare find gracing anyone’s property today. There are few authentic, old wooden flagpoles left. Very few. The only other one I know of is in Deerfield.

From that moment, probably in March of 1997, I knew I would someday put that flagpole back up and hang a flag from it, but I was never satisfied with the location. It made no sense that it should go there, in a depression that morphs into a deep puddle during winter melts and summer storms. I questioned that it “belonged” there. There had to be a more appropriate place, one that was obvious. There was. I found it. “Documented.”

Thankfully, Mr. Nims left behind many old photos of this place and its people after transferring the deed to my family. He said he had relatives who’d like the pictures but he thought they belonged with the place, its rich history, and should not be removed, forever separated, legacy lost. Because of those pictures, the ones he intentionally left behind, I soon discovered that my suspicions were valid about the flagpole site he had shown me. That was not its original place. It had likely been placed there sometime during the 20th century, before the handsome, ornamental Japanese maples were planted, probably after the first time it had rotted and snapped off, leaving the base in the ground. Whoever planted the trees, probably Helen Gerrett, had left the proud flagpole in place, likely unaware that two of the prettiest trees in Greenfield would someday grow as tall as they now stand.

Over the years, hidden behind those trees in the damp depression where water frequently pools deep enough to sail a toy boat, the buried base of that pimpled wooden pole had rotted and snapped off in the wind, dropping to the turf like a felled fir. From there, the prostrate pole had been lugged to the barn and lain in the runway, where it was pointed out to me by pastkeeper Nims, aware of its importance, hopeful I would rehabilitate it.

A 19th century photo of my buildings, the words Old Tavern Farm painted in bold white letters across the carriage sheds, shows the flagpole right in front of the sheds, gracing the crest of the island inside the horseshoe driveway. It was an ideal site, semi-centered, large wooden globe overextending the ridge cap by perhaps 10 feet, framed by a 2 1/2-story barn on the left, dwelling on the right. When we inquired about the best way to re-install the pole to its proper, showy place, we were advised to keep the base above ground in a pinned, cast-iron sleeve set in a frame four feet below ground in a concrete boot. That way it would regain its original standing height. We did so just in time for the Fourth of July 2000, when we celebrated the occasion with a cookout for my family and that of steeplejack Mike Mastrototara, who had advised us, ordered the sleeve from Steel Shed in Bernardston and gold-leafed the antique wooden globe, now split in two and lying on a shelf for posterity. In retrospect, we should have known better. How could we expect an ancient wooden artifact like that to survive more harsh weather? When it split and fell to the ground, we replaced it from a catalog with a contemporary, hollow brass globe, which is, to be honest, a sorry replacement. The original is always better.

But, still, it is comforting to know that our historic flagpole, a venerable wooden monument, is  standing where it was meant to be, where it originally stood, all because of a 19th century photo. I have twice painted it, first before the proper, patriotic raising, again a few years later. The sleeve simplifies the project, eliminating the need for a ladder. By removing the bottom of two pins in the base, you can slowly walk the pole down to a horizontal position, temporarily resting the top third across a carpenter’s horse standing in the driveway. Soon, it’ll need another coat of brilliant-white Benjamin Moore – formal high-gloss, of course, for emphasis.

It’s a treasure, standing tall sentry over our historic Greenfield Meadows landmark, once a public house on the post road to Bennington.

One rare relic fronting another.

Sanderson chest

I’ve been poking around lately in the western Franklin County hill towns of Conway and Ashfield, walking old roads, investigating cellar holes, town histories, old maps, genealogies, deeds, probate records, talking to landowners … trying to connect the dots. It’s never easy, this world of discovery, but always rewarding, even invigorating. Great fun. Cheap entertainment.

Along the way, all kinds of peripheral stuff turns up, things like stone Seven-Mile Line bounds buried deep in the forest, long-lost landmarks like Balanced Rock, no longer visible even in aerial photos because it’s buried deep under a lush hardwood canopy. And, strange as it may seem, when I traipse around this general area that’s so rich in history, be it with gun in hand, walking the dogs, or just horsing around, exploring long-ago discontinued roads in my Tacoma pickup, my mind wanders back to my Sanderson chest of six graduated drawers; pine, distinctive and a bit mysterious because of the six fishtail drops descending from its straight bracket base — not the typical location of such a formal furniture embellishment, in fact no one seems to have ever seen such a thing descending from a chest-of-drawers’ base.

The chest has a documented history through a series of brides recorded on a yellowed piece of paper taped to a backboard; invaluable information, rare too, on furniture. When able to document such a provenance, trace it from first owner to last, the homes it graced, the alterations, repairs, refinishing (ouch!), it just brings it to life, casts a warm glow over it. Such a glow has graced this piece of family history lately, a direct result of my whimsical exploration of woodlands long familiar to my Whately ancestors.

I first thought this tall chest was the handiwork of William Mather, who came to Whately from Lyme, Ct., in 1787 with father Benjamin, a retired, somewhat quirky, sea captain. Mather, a cousin of iconic cabinetmaker Samuel Loomis of Colchester, Ct., through maternal lines, was himself a joiner, Whately’s finest, and he had a documented account with Deacon Thomas Sanderson, my fifth great grandfather, whose daughter-in-law, Mehitable Wing of Conway, wife of son Silas, is the first recipient of the chest as a wedding gift. Because fishtail drops are associated with Mather’s 18th century New London County, Connecticut — typically centered on the skirts of highboys and lowboys, along the crest rails of chairs, or crowning pillar-and-scroll and banjo clocks — it seemed like a no-brainer that Mather was the maker. The attribution became even more likely because of the lobster-tail drop on a well-known early 19th-century Chippendale highboy made by Mather for Dea. Thomas Sanderson.

But wait a minute. Wouldn’t the wedding gift have come from the bride’s family, not the Whately Sandersons? Yes, more likely indeed. And guess what? The Wing family came to Conway during the last quarter of the 18th century from Harwich/Cape Cod/Mass., another likely source for maritime furniture embellishments. Not only that, but there were joiners in the Wing family, one of them right in Ashfield. Elisha — son of sea Capt. Edward Wing of Goshen, cousin of Mehitable’s grandfather, John of Conway — also may have had something to do with it. Or perhaps another Cape Cod joiner had made it for the Wings before they departed for the wilds of WMass, maybe first the property of Mehitable’s grandmother, Abigail Snow. Hmmmm? Isn’t that the more likely origin of the Sanderson chest? Somewhere in the Wing family of the bride? Matrilineal descent? Seems to make more sense.

We’ll see. More research needed. Maybe I’ll never get to the bottom of this riddle. Maybe I will. Isn’t that the fun of collecting?

Mad Meg theme designed by BrokenCrust for WordPress © | Top