How Many’s Too Many?

For pure pleasure and optimal efficiency, you can’t beat one flush-and-retrieve bird dog between two hunters combing a dense, wet, thorny covert.

When the dog’s working between the two of you and under control, a flush is usually a kill. But when the gun dog “makes game” and trails a running bird left or right of center, the hunter on whatever side the animal is trailing must follow it and stay within range of a potential flush. Such a routine typically circles you back to the spot where the chase began a couple of times, then off in a different direction before the bird flushes, often but not always near a rosebush, alder row or ditch.

If both hunters are familiar with the game, work well together, and can accurately read the dog and shoot, it’s a highly effective and thoroughly enjoyable method of wing-shooting. By aggressively protecting your half of the dog’s quarter, covering both sides of high, slim, tree rows or brooks, and constantly communicating, your chances of “getting burned” by a screened or wild flush decrease significantly. But it’s rarely a walk in the park. Following a flushing dog that’s pursuing a hot running scent through big, deep cover takes spirit and a certain level of fitness, but mostly spirit.

This whole formula changes dramatically when you throw a second dog into the mix, because it’s never easy to focus on two dogs’ simultaneously, particularly when one’s an old pro, the other a well-bred juvenile with everything going for it but experience. You have confidence in the proven dog and tend to focus more on it than the puppy, but this is a recipe for failure once the puppy learns what it’s looking for and discovers how to use the wind to its advantage.

In short, hunting over one good bird dog is a gentlemanly activity, but throw in the other dog and it can quickly become chaotic, producing wild, unexpected flushes and longer, more challenging shots. For the past five weeks, now that I’ve thrown 7-month-young Tiger Lily into the mix with 7-year-old Ringo, let’s just say I’m becoming more comfortable with the latter, chaotic scenario — one that I surely could have handled much easier before my half-century-old body started deteriorating. But that’s where the willpower comes in: If you have it, you never cease to amaze yourself; and you’d be surprised what high, tightly laced boots, briar-busting pants, a light side-by-side, and 800 milligrams of Ibuprofen can do for an old guy who loves to hunt.

It’s true that a guy could save himself some trouble by refusing to hunt over two dogs and alternating between them from covert to covert. But if you love your animals, it’s difficult to leave one home with wanting eyes and wagging tail, and it’s impossible to leave one in the Porta-Kennel at each covert, then listen to its loud, vocal objection each step of the way. If you’ve never heard it, believe me, it isn’t pleasing.

Personally, I can’t understand why anyone would load a dog that earns its keep into a crate and leave it there at a covert so you can hunt another. It just doesn’t make sense to me. That’s why I refuse to do it, no matter how difficult a hunt over two dogs can turn.

Of course, if you really want to torture yourself, experience the epitome of masochism, hunt alone with two dogs, sacrificing the ability to give your partner a heads-up when the animal you aren’t following is hot and headed in the opposite direction of the other dog. Yep, you’re on your own when hunting alone over two dogs frantically trailing a bird that’s looping and stopping and sprinting down the outside of a hedgerow to escape its pursuer. And it never fails that you’re watching one animal that’s sure the bird’s a foot in front of it and — bingo! — the other dog flushes it behind you, on the other side of tall alders. All you can do is listen to it fly away, ankle-deep in black, unforgiving swamp muck.

So, you ask, why would anyone put himself in such a vulnerable position when he could avoid it? Well, the way I look at it, you buy a dog to hunt, it gets six weeks a year to do so, and I just can’t justify leaving one behind for my own selfish reasons. I was the one who decided to own two, so the problems created should be mine, not the dogs’.

Truth be told, I wish I could find a couple more “problems” like that.

Cy’s Cellar

People often ask why I write about locations I’m unwilling to pinpoint. The answer is simple: Maps draw crowds that compromise special places, which soon lose their sacred status, be they fishing holes, deer stands, strut zones or historic sites buried under a forest canopy.

I found such a site just this week, one I had been trying to locate for weeks and would rather not share with grave-robbers. I guess how it came to me is most interesting, an example of how a persistent sleuth finds things once he puts his mind to it, reading, writing, ”asking around.” I call it discovery, a process that’s fascinated me since a boy, although, for some reason, I never found it in the classroom. Maybe that was my fault. But when you think of it, once you have the basics — the innate curiosity, the perseverance — who needs advanced classroom instruction and professorial scrutiny? Like the wise old man of a Dartmouth/Harvard pedigree once told me to conclude a short discussion about the philosophies of education: ”If all you learn in school is how to find information, that’s all you need.” That comment from an accomplished gent of a classical education hit me like a 10-pound sledgehammer to the kisser, a bull’s-eye. So, take heed class clowns: there is hope for all, with or without fancy academic degrees that are all too often earned by bootlicking and a, b, c, d, or all-of-the-above testing. I have met many with impressive credentials who couldn’t find their way home without a compass, eggheads who can dazzle you with facts, figures and Shakespearean verse but have no clue, no peripheral vision, no needle to meld their knowledge into something meaningful.

My latest local-history discovery occurred in Conway, along the so-called Seven-Mile Line, in woods I first explored before puberty, fishing, then in my teens, hunting partridge and deer, then horsing around in my friend’s 1972 Toyota Landcruiser, dubbed the ”Toyotski,” then shortened to ”Yotski,” a vehicle that produced incredible off-road adventure. Give us that Yotski, a come-along, 40 feet of heavy chain, and a chain saw, and we were unstoppable … believe me. But let’s not digress. I feel like I’m looking out the window on a bright spring day during expository-writing class.

The fact is that I had often danced around the periphery of the historical landmark I discovered this week. I probably even passed right through it but had no clue the cellar hole of Conway’s first settler was there. Cyrus Rice, a Barre man, built his home there in 1762 or ’63, on a western elevation looking back toward Old Deerfield, in the so-called South East District of Deerfield, overlooking Sawmill Plain and Mill River, both part of the Long Hill Division West, if any of that makes sense. It does to me, and I suppose that’s all that matters. But it can be confusing, especially to an outsider reading Sheldon or other local 19th century historians for the first time. Even I — a native who’s explored the local woods for nearly two generations — had difficulty deciphering the location of this site from written description. In fact, had it not been for an impromptu stop at Hatfield’s Bradstreet Cemetery, Memorial Day, on an asparagus run, looking for the grave of a relative, I’d probably still be trying to figure it out. My sense from what I had read was that the Rice site was situated on the south side of Hoosac Road, overlooking Stillwater. I was wrong. It’s south of there, that’s all I’m saying. Sorry, fellas.

But back to Bradstreet, the cemetery, my wife relaxing in the car, me searching for the grave of Martha (Almira Sanderson) Field, sister of my great-grandfather, Willis Chapman Sanderson. I vaguely remember Ant Mattie as old, Hatfield’s oldest citizen, holder of its golden cane, still taking care of herself after passing the century mark on May 27, 1976, a rare bird. I probably would have found her grave had I not bumped into three cyclists stopped for a break at the graveyard, but I got gabbing and didn’t want to leave my wife in the car too long.

I recognized the pretty blonde lady in the group. She was from Conway and we had met somewhere. I couldn’t remember where. We spoke. She refreshed my memory. At a friend of mine’s memorial service. Of course. How nice to see her again, happenstance on a gorgeous spring afternoon. A man and woman, presumably spouses, accompanied her, they too from Conway. They happened to live along a road I’d been traveling recently while researching its earliest residents. I knew who they were once they introduced themselves, both behind me at Frontier Regional School, but I knew their older siblings. The three friends knew each other from their days as neighbors along my road of interest. They were familiar with the old trails from hiking and biking, horseback, snowmobile and dirt-bike riding. No, I couldn’t have found three better resources had I been searching. So I picked their brains about the discontinued roads I’d been studying on old maps when the man chimed in about the site of the early Rice farmstead. Bingo! I had what I’d been searching for without even asking. Not where I expected it, either. A wooden sign on a tree, to boot. I would find it. Sooner the better

The next day on the phone I delivered the good news to a friend who’s recently been exploring Conway with me. He also had some new information to chase down in my 4-wheel-drive truck, and the day was ideal for him. Me, too. So off I went, three dogs porta-kenneled on the truck’s bed, all of us eager for a little safari.

I picked up my friend and took a ride, circling a couple of hills, stopping to examine the outflow of a few abandoned roads, their paths back into the woods, and even found the gate to a road we’ve wanted to explore open, inviting us in. We drove all the way to a dead-end snowmobile bridge crossing a bog. We got out, both of us, three dogs, crossed the bridge, followed the road a short distance to a fork, got acclimated and turned back. Then off to a driveway the cyclists told me about, one that will bring you to the Rice homestead. We drove in but weren’t certain it was cool, so I decided to turn around and travel farther down the road to see if the male cyclist was home. He wasn’t. His son was. Said his dad was having lunch, would be right back. Soon Dad appeared, told us the easiest route to the marker, through private property. Said the landowner wouldn’t mind historical-research trespassers. Off we went to give it a shot.

We arrived at the driveway to the landowner’s home and drove in, perhaps a quarter-mile to a dwelling I had no clue was there, on that road I traveled many years ago. I got out and knocked, yellow labs barking, no answer from inside. We continued up the narrow road and came upon a bearded man wearing head gear and earphones, mowing grass down the side of the road toward us. I got out of the truck, explained our reason for being there, and he was friendly, accommodating, leading us right to the site a short distance up the gradual hill. The small wooden sign was there, head-high, behind it a small L-shaped cellar hole. According to Conway historian Rev. Charles B. Rice, the marked site was a later Rice home, the original stood 25 rods southeast. When my friend broke the news to our guide, he said there was another ancient cellar hole down the hill a bit. We went to it and, after a brief hunt, found a small, stone-clad depression, about 30 feet long, maybe 12 feet wide, sitting on a gentle elevation, sheltered in a hollow, spring brook nearby, loam black and fertile; a peaceful upland alcove in which to build an early home.

And to think it all began on a whim, a spontaneous graveyard visit.

Spooky, huh?

Next time, I’ll find Ant Mattie.

Promise.

Peter’s Grief

There was nothing unusual at the start of our telephone conversation last week, me at my Recorder desk, he his New Salem home, after dark. Pretty typical for my rambling chats over the years with Peter Mallett, brainchild/promoter in chief of the Miller River Fishermen’s Association.

An affable sort, he’s always been upbeat and enthusiastic when we talk about his passion for fishing the Millers River, not to mention the hidden-jewel wetlands in its basin, places where native squaretails lurk and few know it. He knows where the aristocrats of New England waters reside, and he keeps it quiet, thank you; something that ain’t changin’ anytime soon.

Anyway, for the first time in my five-or-so-year telephone relationship with the man who I have not yet met eyes with, I felt another sort of passion emanating from his soul, one wreaking of grief and pain and devastating loss, so profound that I myself could feel it deep within; poignant times 10, no, maybe 100. For the first time he was sharing with me the loss of his only child, a son and fishing companion who left this world at the tender age of 19 in an automobile accident, 1993, 15 short years ago. To him, it seems like hours, maybe minutes, that agonizing.

“I miss him terrible, and think of him every day,” he admitted, voice crackling at the thought of a precious child ripped suddenly from his life. “That’s why I do what I do on the Millers River and the other places I stock. I do it for my son. He loved fishing, lived for it. When I catch a nice fish now I always look to the sky and say, ‘Thank you, Shon, I love you.”

Powerful stuff from this, a man I had previously known only through sporadic, light, playful banter and whimsical chit-chat. Overpowering, in fact. The kind of human emotion that rips at your guts, moistens your eye sockets, brings a hollow lightness to your throat, your upper torso. Grief like that is tough to take, even when it’s someone else’s, and that’s what I was experiencing, palpable grief, transference of the worst kind of emotional pain and suffering; spontaneous, unexpected, gut-wrenching. I ached for him.

This year Mallett has already stocked a four-pound rainbow trout wearing a tag worth $100 in memory of Shon Michael Mallett into the Millers River, another for the late Skott McKenzie, an early MRFA supporter who worked in the L.S. Starrett paint department before cancer took him a few years ago. “Skott was the first person to put a dollar into one of my donation cans, my most loyal supporter early-on, and the best fisherman I’ve ever been around,” Mallett said. “I wanted to do something special for him and for my son and inspiration.”

The two $100 trout are swimming in the river now, and the only person who knows where they were released is Mallett himself, who isn’t giving any clues. “People’ve been asking me where I put ’em, but I won’t tell anyone,” he said. “I’m the only one who knows and that’s how it’s gonna stay.”

Anyhow, when I reached Mallet Monday on his cell phone at midday, he had just arrived home to hundreds of beautiful brook and rainbow trout ticketed for stocking this week. “Big brookies, 12 to 14 inches,” he said, “and some really big rainbows. I think everyone will love these fish.” Fish he has to travel to southeast Massachusetts for now that Sunderland’s Mohawk Hatchery is closed.

Ever the carnival barker, Mallett wanted to remind everyone that donations are always appreciated. “People have been great to us,” he said, and the river is the beneficiary. His goal is to make the Millers River the state’s premier trout stream, and he’s well on his way, if not already there.

River Ramble

Yes, the brook’s roaring, the songbirds’re singing, the snowbanks’re shrinking, and my last load of cordwood’s drying ever so slowly, stacked under the eaves of the sunny carriage sheds. No, it isn’t time for stream-fishing here in the northern tier of Franklin County. Too much snow, way too much, in fact; even worse, annoying mud to follow.

Yee-uck!

But still, before you know it, stocking trucks will be rolling on our roadways. Trust me. And what a welcome sight they’ll be for everyone, especially anglers, who in better days could, in print, be called fishermen. There is a difference between fishermen and anglers, you know, but I guess your DOB would have to fall before 1980 to understand it. Sad but true. That from an understander, sorta like a decider, if you know what I mean.

The stocking has already started south of here, where the snow disappeared weeks ago, as unimaginable as that may seem to snowbound hilltowners. But it’s fact. Travel the valley Interstate and you’ll find the snowline following the Whately/Hatfield line. South of there it’s gone, very April like. But not here, where winter is lingering like a slobbering drunkard at an open-bar bash. You know the type. The longer they stay, the louder they get. That’s what this winter reminds me of, the barroom bore spitting praise of that great American hero, Grampy McCain, who’ll beat that b-word Hillary and n-word Barack like he himself was beaten at the Hanoi Hilton. Just you wait and see. God bless America. Praise the lord. Slaughter the anti-Christ terrorists. … Haven’t we been through this drill before?

But let’s not digress. What I’m trying to say is that if you haven’t already done so, it’s time to rescue your fishing equipment from the dusty shed for its annual once-over. Cleaning and oiling and replacing line are perfect chores to perform with March Madness dominating your inner sanctum, color analysts, themselves former players and coaches, extolling the virtues of sport, how it builds character, makes America a better place. As they preach, believe me, the chores won’t interfere with your brackets one iota.

Brackets? Yeah, you know what I’m talking about. Doesn’t everyone have at least one? Well, not everyone, I guess. In fact, I must admit I don’t. Must be the malaise brought on by male menopause. Yeah, that’s it, male menopause, middle-age lethargy. I’m sure I can find a doctor, maybe a therapist, to support my layman’s diagnosis. And there’s definitely a pill to cure it, maybe a handful three times a day if you’re willing to bury your face in a Reader’s Digest for an hour before spilling your guts to a total stranger in a stifling, antiseptic space. Praise the world of office visits and pharmaceutical solutions: gulp … ah! … your troubles behind you.

Myself, well, I guess I’ll just deal with such maladies the old-fashioned way; keep plugging, a day at a time, steady she goes, don’t even glance in the rearview. Yup, that’s the route I’m gonna take, even though it does absolutely nothing for the economy or hungry Pfizer shareholders.

Enough! There I go again, getting distracted by current events and modern solutions to ancient issues. What I really wanted to say is that trout-stocking has begun. Those trucks with insignias on their doors, purring, aerated tanks on their spines, will soon be depositing nets full of shiny trout into sparkling waters near you. Thankfully, waters like that still exist here in the impoverished valley and its glorious hills. But don’t take them for granted, these hills and dales, rivers, streams and bogs. Neglected, they’ll be devoured by glutinous big-box development, wiped from the face of the earth for a buck and a quick, unimaginative fix.

Why can’t we all just get along and look like Arkansas or Texas or Tuscaloosa, places where you wouldn’t stick your little toe into a river, never mind eat something from it? Why can’t we all buy cheap toys made in some Chinese sweatshop, and poisoned food for our pets and selves? Everyone else is doing it. Why not us?

Whew! Glad I finally spit-up that hairball. But if that’s where this bus is headed, count me out. I have another destination in mind. Me, I’ll be the deranged loner, a little rough around the edges, unshaven, wetting my worm in the whitewater froth below the damp, shaded gristmill ruins. It’s a better place. Far better.

If y’all don’t believe me, then order yourself a fat Cheezdawg to-go and take a little nature walk. But please, I beg, don’t leave the wrapper at the water’s edge. It’s toxic.

Rebel Retreat

An undisturbed snowplow ridge told the story: It had been months since a four-wheeled vehicle had driven the aboriginal trail that became a Colonial path, then a well-used thoroughfare from Williamsburg to Conway until discontinued around 1950.

Because the mud season hadn’t yet arrived, I decided to give it a shot, convinced I’d stay atop the solid, crunchy corn snow, confident the come-along and chain in my pickup’s bed would rescue us if needed, always a comforting thought. But we got through our little journey fine, no issues, then poked around briefly in a quiet hardwood forest, once the farmstead of 18th century rebel Perez Bardwell, a Whately man of hardscrabble Yankee temperament. Unusual name for the time, too.

I had traveled this intentionally unnamed, unimproved road many times in worse conditions, deeper snow, muddier, with chains fastened around my back tires. So I was confident my all-terrain treads would take us the short distance required without calamity, which, at midday, work in the foreground, I wanted no part of. An experienced four-wheeler never lets his guard down at this time of year, the absolute worst if the mud is right. I know. Seems I learn most lessons the hard way, including mud-caked misadventures. Guess it’s just who I am. But it’s gotten me this far and I’m too old to change.

My passenger was a Pennsylvania native who touched down in Conway some four years ago and, having a history background, is enthralled with the town and its 18th century pioneers. Of particular interest to the man, working on a book, is a fiery Bardwell soul brother named Samuel Ely, a disrobed Congregational minister who came to Conway from Somers, Conn., in 1772 and called our western hilltown home for 10 turbulent years. It was during his final year there, in 1782, that he whipped a frenzied mob into open revolt against the Massachusetts government and Hampshire County Court. Coined Ely’s Insurrection, the clamor proved to be a precursor to Shays’ Rebellion (1786-87), which brought western Massachusetts notoriety before the Constitution was written or George Washington was elected our first president.

Back in the day, Ely knew well the country we traversed, the roads, too, connecting Conway, Whately, Burgy and beyond. In fact, a road we sampled would have been his route from Conway to the Hampshire County Courthouse he and his insurgents assaulted. That’s why I showed my newfound historian friend the layout, for perspective, not to mention invigorating chatter. Our interests intersect in many local-history spheres and, come to find out, politics as well … a subject to approach on tip-toes with someone new.

Always searching for an excuse to visit my favorite haunts before turkey season and after a tough winter on deer, I was more than willing to show my companion the lay of the land, and the place Bardwell called home before moving around 1790 to Phelps, Wayne County, N.Y., where he died in 1815. A proud veteran of French and Indian War expeditions to Crown Point and Canada, then a Revolutionary lieutenant, Bardwell was a member of the mob that freed Ely from jail in Springfield, then briefly was held hostage by Northampton authorities trying to recover Ely. I knew Bardwell’s cellar hole from research following many deer hunts there, and thought it would be of interest to my passenger.

We pulled up to the intersection of two wooded trails and parked, releasing two of my Springers, Lily and Bessie, from their porta-kennels before taking a short trek, maybe 100 yards, to the flat wooded site at the base of a ridge. The first visible remains were stones from a barn’s foundation, then 100 feet east, a stone-clad cellar hole some 40 by 25 feet, no indication of where the chimney had stood, probably centered. A short distance east of the homesite was a small, clear, free-flowing spring brook, then, some 75 feet upstream, a stone foundation that crossed it, likely a barn judging from the high western foundation butted up against a shallow hill; no small barn, either.

During hunts and hikes covering bits of five decades and two centuries, I have identified many similar sites in those woods, reconstructing a lost world in my memory’s bedrock. It’s a fascination that lures me to such places, often alone, gun in hand, so it’s always a bonus to meet someone to share them with, especially folks who’ll respect and leave them undisturbed, no metal detectors, please. My companion on that day fit the bill.

Our first field trip was brief; too short, in fact; but I was able to point out future exploration routes along the way, ones we’ll revisit when the snow’s gone and the turkeys are gobbling. Once the mud dries, we’ll return for further inspection along roads that appeared iffy this week. Why push it? The day will soon come when I’ll be able to show him Morton’s mill, Elihu Waite’s farm, and the small home of Isaac ”Cider Marsh,” known before the turn of the 19th century for the spirituous liquors he distilled and, apparently, liberally consumed. Legend has it that people in the neighborhood back then referred to 30-barrel tanks as ”Marsh’s tumblers,” obviously a tribute to a man who could ”hold his liquor.” Yes, sir, they say old Cider Marsh was quite the boy, a throwback from way back, a local legend whose spirit still lurks in the damp watershed air. My newfound Conway friend and I will return to pull this damp, wooded, Marshy spirit deep into our lungs. From it will come lively conversation, a brisk walk, an energetic romp for my pets. It’ll be mutually beneficial. Stimulating on many levels. Physical, mental, spiritual. Especially the latter.

I guess it’s all about knowing the woods in a way not generally associated with hunting.

Like chasing ghosts, kindred spirits.

Camp Meat

They’re raising a ruckus in the sleepy Hampshire County hilltown of Chesterfield, where officials are threatening to shut down a longtime camp on a Boy Scout reservation in a dispute over a temporary summer shooting range.

Although I don’t intend to research and devote a lot of time to the case — surely, much to the chagrin of those who will scream bloody murder that it’s my duty as a hook & bullet columnist — it is local and, thus, worthy of mention. So, I’ll just be the messenger. No more, no less. Anyone previously unaware and so inclined can get involved.

To summarize briefly, a Chesterfield neighbor or two has complained about the summer noise emanating from the camp and other issues pertaining to guns and the antis who loathe them. The clamor reached town officials’ ears long ago, and now, after two years of bickering, the town has ruled in favor of the plaintiffs by, 1.) prohibiting the Scouts from allowing others to use their property, and 2.) limiting firearm use to small-caliber rifles.

Unhappy with the town’s decision, the Boy Scouts have filed a federal-court appeal, and the Gun Owners Action League, a state firearm association that runs the shooting camp along with MassWildlife, has jumped into the fray to offer its support. It won’t be long before the National Rifle Association appears, if it hasn’t already, so expect a long, drawn-out fight and media barrage when the NRA reaches into its deep pockets to support the Scouts’ right to continue using their rifle range as pleased.

This dispute has a lot to say about the way times have changed in our Hampshire/Franklin hamlets, where outfits like this Massachusetts Junior Conservation Camp in tiny Chesterfield ran smoothly and out of harm’s way for generations, no complaints from tolerant backwoods residents who owned guns, probably hunted and had no fear of gunfire. Now, the same expansive hilltown farms these simple agrarian folks maintained for centuries have fallen into the hands of fancy-pants metropolitans, accustomed to gangs and drive-bys, committed to gun-control and political correctness. They don’t buy second homes in the country to put up with gunfire, the poor souls. That’s why camps like the one under fire in Chesterfield cannot escape challenges. Sad but true. And take it to the bank, there will be more.

Is it right? No. Not from this perch. I say live and let live. But count me out of this battle. While I believe strongly in my right to bear arms, there is nothing else about which I agree with right-wing organizations like the NRA. As a kid, I found Charlton Heston entertaining in his Western films; as an adult, I viewed the aging actor as frightening when exposed to his wild-eyed NRA rhetoric.

Sorry, fellas, I know its sacrilege, even blasphemy, coming from a gun-owner and hunter. But that’s the way I feel and I’m not ashamed to admit it. Simply stated, NRA and GOAL politics are not for me. So let someone else carry their water.

I’m not religious or self-righteous, don’t have a Southern twang, am pro-choice, pro-union, and antiwar. So how can I support the NRA?

Impossible.

Coy Dogs

Another evening phone call at my Recorder desk that got my wheels spinning. Gotta love it.

The caller was a dear old friend, one I see far too little of now that we’ve “grown up” and gone our separate ways. That’s life. But he touches base now and again, usually at my workplace, to rattle my cage about something or even discuss a serious matter. This was the latter.

I knew he was stirred when he asked, “Hey Bags (my nickname since childhood), why do they protect those goddamn coy dogs? Someone’s got to tell them to smarten up. What good are they? Why don’t you go after the idiots protecting them? I’m gonna shoot every one I can whether they like it or not.”

Strong words from an otherwise conservative, law-abiding man. And he is far from the only person with such a strong opinion in disfavor of our Eastern coyote. You’ll hear the same rant from country folk who raise livestock or fowl, own cats or dogs, any of which can feel the deadly fury of the opportunistic Eastern coyote, still “coy dogs” to some in the Franklin County vernacular.

Before we proceed, be it known there are readers out there who’ll accuse me of publicizing or even lending credence to an irresponsible point of view. But I’ll take my lumps here. I believe people are entitled to their opinions in this land of the free, home of the brave, despite what “culture warriors” Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity, those two “fair-and-balanced” guardians of freedom, liberty and justice, say.

But let’s not digress. … Back to my buddy and his coyote problem, which left me a little perplexed at the start of our conversation. I tried to clear my confusion.

“Why do you say they’re protected?”

“Because they have a season on them. You should be able to shoot ’em year around.”

“Oh yeah, I guess the season goes from November to March. That’s not long enough for you?”

“No. It should be year around. What good are they? When I see them around my place, I’m gonna kill ’em. Take that to the bank.”

What had my friend’s blood boiling was backyard slaughter, a poignant, bloody mess on virgin snow. It seems he’d grown quite fond of three fawns and two does feeding at the edge of his yard since June and enjoyed their presence as many rural residents do. There’s just something peaceful and comforting about deer grazing on your lawn when you pull into your driveway at dusk. “They weren’t tame by any means but they’d stay right there, look at me and keep eating as long as I didn’t make a loud noise, quick movement or anything.”

Presumably due to the abundance of acorns and the lack of snow and winter cold through January, the deer were noticeably absent for months, totally ignoring the winter corn piles Mr. Bad Boy had dumped along the woods line, and he was wondering what was going on. Deer had always come to his cracked corn in previous years, but this year nothing. But then came the snow, the bitter cold and the deer, daily in February.

Yeah, yeah, we all know the authorities frown on feeding wild animals, including if not especially deer. In fact, it’s downright illegal. But we also know that people do it all the time and will continue to do so. So, given that there’s little anyone’s going to do about it, let’s just ignore the issue for the sake of telling a story.

With the late winter finally taking root for the February freeze, the deer came to my buddy’s corn regularly for a few weeks then curiously disappeared. After days of absence, he suspected something was amiss. He wasn’t sure what, but something wasn’t right. Then, during the barren period, he came home, noticed hair frozen to the crusty snow and went out back to investigate. Sure enough, coyotes had taken down a deer, probably one of the fawns, right by the corn mounds. All that remained was blood and hair, two telltale signs. He followed a faint trail back into the woods a little ways and came up only with a square piece of hide and hair, nothing else, before turning back.

“Those (illegitimates) killed that deer right there where it was eating. I don’t know if they waited in the bushes and ambushed it or what, but they took it down right where they’d been eating.

Perhaps the deer had been wounded by a car, then devoured, I thought out loud.

“I knew you were going to say that, or that it was for some reason weak. Maybe so, but I think they killed a healthy deer. They sure looked healthy to me.”

It’s definitely possible for canids to take down a healthy deer, particularly on slippery, crusty snow that can be deadly to whitetails. Maybe a family unit of coyotes surprised the group of feeding deer and one of them, startled, slipped and splayed out on the icy surface. It happens, and coyotes are well aware of deer’s helplessness on ice. That’s why they are known to coordinate winter chases toward frozen surfaces, force a whitetail onto the ice and make quick work of it where, hooves rendered useless, it’s splayed on its belly and unable to move, a pathetic sight. Pathetic indeed.

Also, when snow is crusty like it was at the time of the kill last week, deer are particularly vulnerable. When chased by a pack of coyotes or domestic dogs, the pursuers stay on top of the crust and the pursued break through, creating a mismatch, especially in deep snow. The final act is not pretty.

Self-described “animal lovers” who view that final act as an act of nature, not predatory malice, would be the first to abhor a cleaner, quicker, more humane kill of an unsuspecting creature by a bipedal hunter. On one hand, they philosophize it’s wrong to have a vendetta toward coyotes for slaying deer, on the other they propose a ban on immoral human hunting.

Go figure.

A couple of items about, dare I say, competing interests on the Millers River conservation front, one about the upstart Millers River Fishermen’s Association led by indomitable Peter Mallett, the other regarding the Millers River Chapter of Trout Unlimited and Ken Elmer.

To avoid any favoritism accusations we’ll list them according to date of the event they want publicized, which means the MRFA agenda first.

— Mallett and the boys will be set up at Sunday’s annual North Quabbin Sportsmen’s Experience, a sporting show held at the Athol-Orange Elks. There and later at the annual Millers River Rat Race (April 14), the MRFA will be selling raffle tickets for a Cabela’s Panther river-drift pontoon boat to be raffled off on June 30, the date of the organization’s fishing derby for kids 1-14. … In other MRFA news, the organization is selling five-piece topographical map sets of the Millers River basin, including all 45 miles of river. The cost is $10. They are available by calling Mallett at (978) 544-7126 or visiting the MRFA Web site. … The MRFA has organized two trout-stocking and tagging events in May. The first on May 5 at the Orange Wastewater Treatment Plant off Route 2A, the second on May 19 at the Birch Hill parking lot in South Royalston. Kids will be allowed to tag their own trout for release into the river on those dates. … Whew! Never short and sweet when it comes to Mr. Mallett.

— As for the MRTU Chapter, it will hold its annual banquet March 31 at the Sacred Heart Church on Cross Street in Gardner. A pasta dinner will be followed by well-known fishing guide Marla Blair, who’ll present a program “Fly Fishing on Kodiak Island, Alaska.” Doors will open at 6 p.m. and supper will be served a half-hour later. Many great raffle items will be up for grabs. For more information, check with the MRTU Web site at www.millersrivertu.org.

A Proud NIMBY

I’m coming out. Jumping into this ”biomess” fiasco. Can’t resist.

I was, at first, reluctant to enter the dustup for many reasons, not the least of which is that a forester I am not. Also, I myself heat with wood, annually sending seven cords’ worth of smoke billowing skyward from October to May. So who am I to complain about wood smoke from biomass or those controversial residential wood boilers, for that matter? But more than anything else, addressing such an issue requires work, and I have other subjects of interests on my plate. Let others do the heavy lifting. I’ll just sit and watch from the sidelines. That was my initial, slothful reaction before the clamor grew deafening and several activists contacted me directly, figuring I wore political stripes similar to theirs.

Well, I finally gave in and jumped softly into the fray last week with a little left jab that brought praise from several biomass opponents and criticism from a supporter who called me a NIMBY, that pejorative acronym that translates as ”not in my back yard,” an attitude I do not deny coddling. In fact, if the critic who called me a NIMBY thought it an insult, what a lame attempt. I am a proud NIMBY, deeply rooted here in the Happy Valley all the way back to our Colonial Contact Period, and committed to preserving the rural character and historic assets of my ancestors, including landscapes. So, send me a NIMBY hat, a shirt to match, and I’ll sport them proudly through City Square, at the polling place, the supermarket, absolutely no hesitation. But, please, none of that cheap Wal-Mart stuff; preferably a New Era fitted cap, either 100 percent cotton or a wool blend; same with the T-shirt, 100 percent cotton, dense thread count. No crap that could poison me from ingestion of sweatband dyes. Made in the USA, hopefully by someone working for a living wage.

So tell me, given my NIMBY predisposition, how could I possibly support a filthy smokestack — brainchild of a faraway investor, to boot — towering over prehistoric Peskeomskut, a landmark in our green, fertile valley? Sorry fellas, ain’t gonna happen. You wanna line up banks of solar panels on some unobtrusive southern exposure, go for it, I’m fully supportive if it’ll take me off the grid. But a smokestack that could lead to forest devastation akin to the photos posted by Massachusetts Forest Watch at www.maforests.org? Uh-uh! Not for me. I don’t call that progress, no matter how much profit can be earned.

Another reason I hesitated to attack this proposed incinerator (ooops) is that ”responsible” logging of our prevalent ”old-growth forest” would improve habitat for game like whitetail deer and ruffed grouse, both of which thrive in young forest. Our deer-management team has identified old-growth forests, particularly in western Franklin and Berkshire counties, as a detriment to attaining their desired deer densities of 12 to 16 per square mile. Forests dominated by large trees 80 and more years old choke off understory, limiting an essential food source crucial for rebuilding a deer herd. Small patches of clear-cutting in harmony with responsible thinning of adjacent old forest stimulates regeneration, producing needed browse to build and sustains a vibrant deer herd. But responsible logging is not what I see on the Forest Watch site, and it’s not what expert Chris Matera describes in his troubling ”Massachusetts Chainsaw Massacre” report at www.maforests.org/Release.pdf, either; an indictment of the Patrick Administration for promoting destructive biomass logging. Look at the photos. Read the report. Tell me it’s appealing to you. The photos hit home. They’re right in our neighboring state forests, disgusting too weak an adjective.

But I don’t want to be unfair. I saw where a Shutesbury forester criticized the anti-biomass hysteria, said there were strict rules in place here in Massachusetts to prevent irresponsible logging. He clearly knows more about the subject than I, and maybe there are rules in place to protect historic landscapes and prevent butcher jobs. But I’m a Sixties guy who doesn’t trust government to ”do the right thing.” Do you?

Of course, there are different opinions among foresters. A case in point is another Franklin County forester and loyal reader of this space. Seeking an expert opinion, I e-mail queried him about the issue last week. His delayed response was interesting. He said he owned forest and would benefit from biomass, which would provide a market for otherwise ”unsalable” wood, ”especially after the great ice storm of 2008.” But the man is more committed to forests and wildlife than dollars and cents, and, ”as an ecologist,” said he has strong reservations about the many biomass proposals statewide. He knows the claims from some colleagues who believe our forests can easily withstand biomass, and that, given our tough forest-cutting restrictions, there is no real danger. But he isn’t buying it. Like me, he appears to harbor a healthy distrust of government. I guess anyone worth their salt should.

Anyway, our informed source — one I have chosen not to name because, in my opinion, it’s not important — broke down his overriding biomass concerns in the note. I found them interesting indeed, not surprising.

”First,” he wrote, ”current cutting laws are mostly aimed at production, not wildlife habitat. We all know that forest management benefits some species, but we know little about wholesale forest cutting and the impacts on some of our animals that have returned because of reforestation. Black bears and ravens come to mind.”

He went on to say he doesn’t trust the numbers being used by biomass proponents and can’t understand why an environmental-impact report wasn’t required, or why one facility isn’t permitted as a test site to study the impact, ”not only on air and water quality, but also wildlife habitat, rare species, etc.”

Our West County source admits he finds the debate interesting and has followed it. He also understands the importance of local energy sources. But, still, he keeps returning to the same crucial question: Is biomass a wise use of our resources? ”Not to sound jaded,” he wrote, ”but right now it looks to me like a plan to make some city-slickers rich. ”I can think of a better use of our forests. Like a home for black bears, for instance.”

Obviously, not all foresters are in his camp. But consider this: Wholesale logging to support raging furnaces could mean work for foresters, consultants who thus may not be our most trusted sources. Conversely, maybe we should heed those opposed, because they’re taking a position that potentially takes money out of their own pockets.

As for the biomass test-site our forester foe proposes: I say send it to Lowell or Lawrence or Brockton, or some other stooped mill town built by child labor on landscapes long ago ravaged. Better still, send it to the industrial heartland or the sunny South; Houston, for instance, where people die and are diseased every day by the air they breathe, the water they drink. Their leaders welcome and deserve such maladies, and can have them.

But, please, not in my back yard.

Yeah, perfect, Not – In – My – Back – Yard.

A beautiful ring to it.

NIMBY

My proud mantra.

Out & About

On the road again, me and an old codger, he a spry octogenarian.

We were following e-mail leads from Conway readers commenting on last week’s column about my visit to Conway’s first cellar hole, that of Cyrus Rice, circa 1763, now hidden in a manicured 350-acre wood lot. The tips led me to Shirkshire, to Poland, then a return to the Rice site for a guided tour by the owners, pleasant academics with warm affection for their land. And what is there not to love about it: cellar holes; a classic well; a spring hole nestled into a depression between two hemlock spines; discontinued 18th-century roads, likely former indigenous trails; even a stately, stone Seven-Mile-Line bound buried deep in the woods behind the old Otto Farm, which started its decline around 1960? That’s when owners Bill and Helena, and son Bill, started to fade. By 1965, both Bills were gone; Helena eight years later. Soon the big dairy barn and silos were gone and the farmhouse had melted into the background, along a well-traveled road, like so many before and after it. Some call it progress. I call it sad. Slow death by industrial revolution; the final days of family farming aimed at subsistence. Once prevalent in the valley and its rolling hills, family farms kept the countryside fresh and fertile, the meats and produce salubrious; organic, no preservatives or poisons. No wonder our ancestors worked so hard and lived so long before we discovered a ”better way,” one that polluted the earth, air and water in a greedy race to riches. But let’s not digress; back to my recent tips and trips, 87-year-old Harry Stafursky in tow, soaking it all in.

Harry grew up on Stafursky Farm, once a square, dual-chimney, hipped-roofed, colonial tavern that served North Shirkshire residents and passersby alike. The building is long gone, burned to the ground in the Sixties or early Seventies. The image in the minds of those who remember it is two massive chimneys standing sentry over the site. The few who remember the whole spread are getting fewer, soon to vanish like the buildings. But Harry remembers it well, lived it, cherishes the memories. So it was interesting to bring him along to view the remains of a large, early farm and mill site on the property of a neighboring landowner, a reader of this space, by chance a distant cousin of mine through the 1749 union of Jonathan Edson and Mehetable Lillie. Yes, a small world indeed, this Pioneer Valley; kinfolk up the ying-yang if you pay attention to such things. I do. Can’t get enough of it. If you don’t know who you are, what’s the sense of living? That’s the outlook that fills my sails.

But, back to the Shirkshire dwelling’s cellar hole, massive hearthstone capping a pile of rubble that once served as the footing for a large, walk-in colonial fireplace; nearby, the stone-clad remains of a significant barn; still farther down the discontinued road, remains of a major dam and millpond, presumably a sawmill and impoundment that provided lumber for construction, ice and sawdust for the milk house. The brook feeds Bear River. Know it well. Often fished the outflow by the bridge as a young man; productive. Who knows who lived there and built this dam? I’d like to piece it all together. The information is at the Registry of Deeds. Another day. No time now.

The next day, Sunday afternoon, we traveled to another part of town, unannounced, me and Harry, in search of the e-mailer whose husband had turned up a derringer in an uprooted tree near his North Poland home; entertainment for both of us, Harry and me. Uplifting.

We arrived at the intersection of Bullitt Road and North Poland and I looked around, trying to figure out which house it was. Then I remembered my dogs, three of them, cooped-up in their porta-kennels since Greenfield, anxious for a hilltown romp, maybe a swim. So we headed up Bullitt Road, toward a reservation, and followed a farm road into a mature hayfield, where we parked and released the animals, eager to scope out the area, figure out what critters had passed through. The dogs sprang through the field, noses on full alert, frolicking, as Harry and I remarked on the beautiful landscape and pleasant change in the air following a deluge.

As we spoke, I noticed chartreuse on the dirt road, then a capped horseback rider trotting up the road. She passed and I whistled the dogs into their crates before heading down the trail toward the road, where we bumped into the rider, doubling back. I stopped and asked if she knew anything about a derringer. She asked if I was Gary. We chatted briefly. She described where she lived, said she’d be along shortly. Harry was amused, tickled by the developments, the method to my madness, how it all seemed to come together on a wing and a prayer. I too was amused in a playful manner. I love hunting, finding things.

We pulled into the woman’s yard, got out of the car and waited. Soon the chartreuse was headed up the long U-shaped driveway. She pulled into the stable at the bend and put her Arabian horse up for the night before walking our way. She invited us in and showed us photos of the derringer, said she was expecting her husband, in the upper meadow, only he could open the safe. We went out on the deck to chat, then heard a tractor approaching. It was him, returning home. We exchanged pleasantries as he approached and he went inside to retrieve the rusty derringer, wooden handles rotted off, circa 1865, Springfield Armory, interesting relic. Who knows? Maybe the corpse was nearby.

When he returned with the pistol, we engaged in lively chat, dancing from one subject to another, Harry right in the middle of it, visibly pleased with the chatter. Then, when he started praising me and my interests, I stopped him, told him it was time to go, didn’t want to wear out our welcome or stir up my wife waiting at home, always a convenient excuse.

We hit the road and I drove Harry back to his place in Greenfield, a meandering route through Conway and Deerfield. In his parking lot, I declined a friendly invitation upstairs. He wanted to show me something. There would be another day. Maybe another Shirkshire jaunt, perhaps Cricket Hill, home of Conway historian Deane Lee, Harry’s late schoolmate, maybe even a visit to Cy’s cellar, South Part, Henhawk Trail. Who knows where our whims will take us? Who cares? It’s never boring, can be invigorating, often providing impetus for new journeys that keep life interesting, the mind active.

It’s all about discovery, equally satisfying for young and old. First, though, you must embrace it, and it you.

Harry knows.

Me too.

A Path to Why

If perceptive, you pay attention to what’s going on around you and, in the process, life proves interesting as you poke and prod for enlightening information that helps form your conception of place and where you fit.

Since moving to Greenfield at the end of the last millennium, I must admit I’ve become more fine-tuned with nature and wildlife, not because my interest has intensified but rather because I’m closer to it, nestled into the back corner of Greenfield, snuggled up to a brook and gorge mouth at the base of the first step to the Berkshire hills. The country setting lends itself to many more wildlife sightings than my previous home in South Deerfield village, even dating back to that neighborhood’s pre-development days of my boyhood. I could count on one hand my deer sightings from that property I grew up on, then owned, and I never saw the bears or wild turkeys that are now fairly common sights in my daily travels; not to mention the skunks, the possum and raccoons that seek out my barn, sheds and the crawl spaces below for shelter. They often eat from my cats’ skillet as owls hoot from the forest’s edge or eagles soar in the infinite blue sky. Great environment.

I will never forget one late afternoon this century when I was out in the woodshed and heard my son screaming out as though alarmed, like the place was afire. Not so. Just a large, silky-black bruin eating apples under a tree at the foot of my driveway. Aware that we were watching, it sauntered off across the road to a field behind a neighbor’s house. Another time, the same son was almost as excited to point out a majestic bald eagle perched in a tall white pine overlooking our common, an unexpected terrace treat.

What I most enjoy studying, though, is white-tail deer, particularly in the spring and summer, when the does drop and raise fawns, and bucks sprout velvety antlers. I find it fascinating to monitor the habits of these smart and noble beasts, learning about territory and diet, protection of young, whatever, as I patrol the upland roads on daily drives with my dogs and sometimes passengers.

Recently, my fancy has been a doe I’ve watched since early spring on a splendid sliver of Franklin County paradise no more than a quarter-mile square. I first caught her feeding evenings with three to five others in a March-brown but greening hayfield, backdropped by southern Vermont’s crowded gumdrop hills. By strawberry season the hay had grown high enough to conceal more than half their bodies, and I’d peer for frozen heads and ears. Then the hay was cut, the sightings easier. So, I have seen this animal several times, usually tight to the wood line, head down, grazing on fresh green growth stimulated by morning dew and spring rain. I occasionally even put the binoculars on her and knew from her skinny face and thin profile that she was a doe in the 110-pound range.

What stroked my curiosity most in June was the potential of nearby fawns, because I knew such a healthy animal living in a dairy habitat should have given birth to at least one. After a week or two of searching for little ones I bumped into a member of the farm family that had harvested the hayfield and asked if he had participated. If so, had he seen the pathetic remains of fawns on the scalped, stubbly field. If not, had his brothers spoken of unfortunate carnage. The answer was no on both counts. Better still, he was sure he would have heard of such mortality because it’s a subject routinely discussed. Farmers of this mechanized era cannot eliminate occasional fawn-kills during first cut, but it’s equally true that they try to avoid it. The problem is that the helpless little ones are invisible as they lay totally still in nests where their mothers leave them. This year a long wet June delayed haying on many fields until after Independence Day, ideal for fawn survival.

Not more than two days after our short, pleasant conversation under the cool, damp shade of a tall pine grove, I was returning home from running my dogs when I saw the doe in her typical place along the wood line, head down, tail flicking nervously. I thought I spotted movement behind her, slowed down to reach for my field glasses to take a closer look and, sure enough, spotted, spindly legged twins, body-mass smaller than my Springer Spaniels. Their mother picked up her head and stood tall as a preacher, facing me from some 150 yards away. Then she must have given the fawns an audible warning signal, because they both scampered into the woods and stood out of sight behind the low vegetation as the doe stood motionless, ears alert, nose expanding and contracting, in a calendar pose. I moved along, not wanting to disturb supper. But I was pleased. Finally a sighting. The little ones had appeared before dark.

Although I have not seen the precious caramel twins since, I have twice bumped into their mother in an adjacent hollow, maybe 350 yards down the hill, near a burial ground. The first time I saw her, sunny midmorning, it caught me by total surprise. I was dropping my pickup’s tailgate to release my dogs into the wetland below when something caught my eye and there she stood, motionless, 15 feet below me. She stared at me, I at her and she trotted off in no great hurry through the pines where I had spoken to the farmer. Hmmmmm, I wondered, big healthy doe, probably the same one, skinny face, but no fawns? They should have been big enough by then to tail along, but she gave no indication they were with her.

A day or two later, I bumped into the neighbor, originally from Ashfield, and we chatted. Had he seen the doe around? Yes. How about little ones? No, but he had seen the doe several times, crossing the road, in his yard, never little ones. He figured she left them bedded in the swamp before going off. I believed him. Made perfect sense.

For a few days after that, no sign of the doe or fawns, but I knew they weren’t far. Then, Sunday evening, right at the site where I had bumped face-to-face into the mother, I backed my truck up to the lip overlooking the small wetland, exited the vehicle, dropped the tailgate, released my three dogs, and a telltale sound greeted us.

”Whew! … Whew!” A deer blew her piercing warning signal, followed by heavy rustling in the woods. Then farther away, ”Whew! … Whew!” two more powerful exhales. The dogs froze facing the sound, ears perked, noses high, vigilant. They knew what it was. So did I.

I returned to the scene Monday morning to exercise my pets. Then, on a departure whim, I took a left instead of the right homeward and pulled into my northern neighbor’s long driveway. His red truck was in the field out back, his wife’s maroon SUV parked by the back door. I spun around the uphill horseshoe toward the SUV and it started to roll, so I exited my vehicle and approached hers. The brake lights shone, her door opened. She hadn’t noticed me approaching.

We exchanged brief pleasantries and I asked her if she had seen the doe with little ones? Yes, two of them. They’d been in her yard several times in recent days. It didn’t surprise me. In fact, I was expecting it.

Just as I had thought, the doe had blown her warning the previous evening to alert her fawns of danger. Instinct confirmed. It’s the kind of stuff that makes life interesting: observation and assessment, interaction with others, spinning the fine-toothed wheels of discovery and imagination.

Some choose the chapel, others the pagoda, but for me nature, place and perspective stitch it all together. It’s all I need to know, a brilliant tapestry, intricate and dynamic … a path to why.

Mad Meg theme designed by BrokenCrust for WordPress © | Top