New Turkey Standard

The 2009 Massachusetts spring turkey harvest did indeed break 3,000 for the first time on record.

The final harvest of 3,072 includes 45 during the inaugural pre-season Youth Hunt. The preliminary harvest released in early June was 3,090, 43 by youths. Discrepancies between preliminary and official harvest are common. The preliminary figure is the fruit of a quick, inexact MassWildlife telephone survey of district offices and checking stations.

Turkey Project Leader Jim Cardoza credited the record harvest to “excellent weather during the first week of the season and an increase in hunter numbers.” Always humble, Cardoza should also take a bow for a job well done. Soon to be retired, he has overseen the program since Day 1.

This year’s record topped the 2008 record of 2,689. We have not experienced a sub-2,000 harvest this millennium and will likely never slip below that number in the future. In fact, 3,000 will probably become the standard, one that may grow to 4,000 if the hunting-pressure remains stable, which is never a given in these days of diminishing hunters.

Preliminary harvests are broken down by the district where birds are checked, which gives you a general idea of the breakdown regionally. The final numbers are fine-tuned by the county in which birds are killed, which pins it down more precisely. The 2009 leader was Worcester County with 780, followed by Berkshire (489), Franklin (434), Plymouth (303), Hampshire (284), Hampden (215), Middlesex (164), Bristol (140), Essex (107), Norfolk (83), Barnstable (25), and Dukes (3) counties.

Non-resident hunters from 12 states took 216 birds.

The production in our Franklin County is interesting, with a third-best total of 434? Throw in Hampshire and Hampden counties, and the Pioneer Valley numbers are quite impressive, 933 to be exact, clearly the best region in which to hunt turkeys. The Hampshire County numbers are probably deceiving because, given the anti-hunting predisposition in such Northeastern academic communities, hunting pressure there is likely thinner than in Franklin County. My educated guess is that there are as many turkeys in Hampshire County as there are here, just fewer hunters and kills. Still, 933 for the valley is pretty damn good, 153 better than Worcester County and a whopping 444 more than Berkshire County, our two bookends, both of which encompas areas spanning from the Vermont to Connecticut borders. Franklin County is the northernmost of three Connecticut Valley counties that consume about the same area. Historically, the entire area was Hampshire County.

Another interesting harvest is 303 in Plymouth County, where the first Thanksgiving elevated turkeys to a higher place among American symbols than baseball and apple pie. The fact that more than 300 birds were taken there this spring is a tribute to Cardoza, his team and our successful restoration project, which focused on southeastern Massachusetts last, during this millennium. Expect the numbers there and on the North Shore to continue on an upward trend for maybe a decade, pushing the annual harvest toward the once unimaginable 4,000 mark.

Take it to the bank: it’s coming.

What They Don’t Tell You

It’s getting to the point where I can’t take it. I shut off the TV, close the windows and scream. It bothers me that much listening to optimistic Republican talking heads confidently predicting a comeback like the one following Goldwater’s landslide defeat of 1964.

After that election, the likes of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan appeared finished, dead and buried, the country headed in a new direction, similar to today. But Nixon and Reagan and the Bushes didn’t lie dormant long. No, they came back with a vengence by reframing the Grand Old Party with Southern-racist, Christian-conservative “Dixiecrats” and anti-abortion Catholics who switched parties and swung elections for more than a generation. Those people went to the polls in droves for guns and God while the Flower people withdrew, alienated and disillusioned, their leaders dead or jailed.

Finally, the wheels came flying off the wagon, compliments of incompetent puppet George W. Bush, a.k.a Bush Light, probably our worst, least-qualified president ever. The dreadful, corrupt Bush years energized a youth movement the likes of which had not been experienced since the Sixties, and out of it came Obama.

Today’s revisionist talking heads would have you believe that people came to their senses after the turbulent Sixties, saw the light, so to speak, and figured it all out in the Seventies. We were headed in the wrong direction and they made a much-needed correction, changed course. At least that’s what they’d have you believe; and those who weren’t around for the Sixties take it hook, line and sinker, victims of boob-tube manipulation. But what these talking heads craftily neglect to mention are the two Kennedy assassinations in the span of five years, not to mention Martin Luther King, Malcolm X and others who were silenced. Those murders and nothing else is what brought Republicans back into power. Even with JFK gone after 1963, had Bobby survived to win the 1968 election, we would have never seen Nixon or Reagan in the White House. Few would disagree.

Were those assassinations pure coincidence? Fate?

Yeah, right! Very difficult to accept for anyone who reads and reasons.

Count me among them.

Salmon Crowding Brookies?

A column about declining Eastern brook trout populations throughout the Northeast prompted a response from West County sportsman Bill Meyers, who identified a problem not mentioned in “Eastern Brook Trout: Status and Threats,” published by Trout Unlimited for the Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture.
Meyers’ point is sure to ruffle feathers, which should come as no shock, given the source; Meyers is no shrinking violet when it comes to sportsmen’s issues.

The Meyers issue confronting West County “squaretails?” Well, try this one on for size: the immature Atlantic salmon being stocked annually into feeder streams of the Deerfield/Connecticut River system.

Hmmmm?

“A group of us who fish for native brookies has had a problem for years,” wrote Meyers in an e-mail. “The invasion of fingerling salmon into our native brookie habitat is the most serious problem confronting anglers today.”

Meyers says he’s mentioned this problem several times to state fisheries officials who offer deaf ears.

“Ask any native-brookie fisherman and they’ll tell you all they catch in the traditional mountain streams are aggressive salmon that have taken residence where they used to catch a lot of natives,” Meyers added. “It’s disappointing to see fry stocked in feeder streams where they have virtually a zero probability of achieving successful downstream passage once they mature, not to mention reaching returning to spawn as adults.

Meyers challenges locals to take a walk along the West County streams he’s referring to and assess the habitat, which he says is ideal to support a burgeoning brookie population. The problem, according to him, is that “the natives have been pushed out by someone who believes that by introducing all this salmon garbage into our mountain streams some act of God is going to happen. They’re barking up the wrong tree.”

An obviously irritated Meyers went on to criticize the Joint Venture, a brookie watchdog group made up of state and federal conservation groups, as a bureaucratic monstrosity that’ll ultimately prove ineffective. “This group will accomplish absolutely nothing other than establishing the brookie as threatened and trying to get federal/state monies to re-establish the population. Does this sound familiar, like a similar unsuccessful effort with another fish? They already destroyed a fishery that once offered exciting opportunities for fishermen. Hopefully some of the old-time native fishermen will speak up.”

I must admit Meyers is not the first local brook angler who’s complained to me loudly about pesky, stocked immature Atlantic salmon interfering with their trout-fishing. It’s a common complaint from people who fish some of my favorite old trout streams, such as West Brook in West Whately, the Bear and South rivers and Poland Brook in Conway, and Dragon Brook in Shelburne; and a good friend of mine has been wailing about the salmon in Clesson Brook for some time. The complaint is that the tiny voracious salmon attack any bait offered, live or artificial, and ultimately telegraph the angler’s presence, costing the angler trout he or she came to catch.

Atlantic-salmon-restoration true believers, even those who are Trout Unlimited members, have little sympathy for squeaky wheels like Meyers. It’s a greater-good issue to them, and thus trout fishermen are going to have to learn to deal with their “perceived” problem. It’s all about salmon with them, the glory fish that supersedes all others; and they’ll support this restoration effort against all odds, even impossible.

But how can these people justify turning their backs on the real native New England salmonoid, our Eastern brook trout, to many North America’s most beautiful freshwater fish?

Downstream Spawning

A development in July 2006 gave hope for downstream spawning in the Connecticut River basin.

The last three salmon captured that summer were seined in Connecticut’s Salmon River, suggesting that the fish had taken residence there long ago, perhaps due to recurring heavy river-flow that prevented upstream migration well into June. Salmon start entering the river at Long Island Sound in April, seeking suitable spawning habitat in the upper reaches of the basin. However, when spring rains flood the lower valley, fish-passage facilities are temporarily shut down, delaying migration. Apparently, when flooding persists and keeps salmon trapped below Holyoke until the rivers reach to 70-degree range, those stragglers find suitable habitat well below their desired upriver destinations, in southern rivers like the Salmon and Farmington in Connecticut, and the Westfield River, where salmon activity in recent years has been encouraging. Were it not for manmade obstacles in Holyoke, Turners Falls, Vermont, Vt., and Bellows Falls, Vt., these fish would more likely be found in northern destinations like the Deerfield and Millers in Massachusetts, not to mention Vermont waterways like the West and White rivers.

While salmon-restoration officials would undoubtedly prefer the free-swimming fish to make it to their historic spawning grounds in Franklin County, MA., and above, they’ll take what they get pertaining to their struggling program. Thus the initiative on the Westfield River, where salmon are released annually above the DSI Dam to spawn naturally in the landlocked river system above that point. In 2006, two of 34 salmon captured on the Westfield were tagged and released to spawn in the river. The other 32 went to the Cronin National Salmon Station in Sunderland, where they’ll be nursed to optimal health prior to controlled fall spawning.

Meyers Enters In

Colrain sportsman Billy Meyers chimed in about a perceived relationship between immature Atlantic salmon stocking and declining Eastern brook trout populations in their native western Franklin County hilltown streams.

He was responding to a one-source tirade against salmon stocking by Leyden octogenarian Edward M. Wells, who spent time on his grandparents’ Buckland farm as a boy and has more than a half-century of personal observation on which to base his opinion. To summarize his complaint, one which he composed in a stinging letter to MassWildlife last year, the immature salmon stocked into our native streams are competing for food and territory with the indigenous brook trout and thus pushing the rightful residents out. Meyers agrees, and voiced that opinion earlier in response to a column about a multifaceted, 17-state conservation initiative called the Eastern Brook Trout Venture. If anything, Meyers’ anti-salmon-stocking position has hardened since then, and shows no sings of softening anytime soon.

“Please keep this issue alive,” he wrote. “Last time it only lasted one column.”

Other hilltown trout anglers who chase tasty squaretail fingerlings for their black, piping-hot skillets concur. They view it as a mortal sin to “pollute” their native brookie streams with hatchery-raised salmon that 40-years-worth of data tells us have little chance of ever making it to Long Island Sound, never mind back again to spawn in the Connecticut River basin. The tragic victims, in their opinion, are not the salmon that fail to return, but rather the brookies displaced by the ravenous foreign fingerlings.

“Not only are the feeder streams being ruined, but the youth for the next generation is being totally deceived,” wrote Meyers, who pulled in the Iraq debacle to make a point about salmon-stocking programs introduced to the local elementary schools in recent years.

“Telling these kids their salmon are coming back is like strapping an explosive vest on 8- to 10-year-old Iraqis and telling them to go visit the U.S. troops for recess and return for lunch,” he wrote. “I am disgusted with this issue. The liberal flyfishing catch-and-releasers still believe they can win the war for the return of this doomed species.”

A respected New England fisheries insider who’s been skeptical about Connecticut River salmon restoration since Day 1 calls these disillusioned folks “true-believers” in the pejorative, comparing them to the Christian zealots who chase Virgin Mary sightings worldwide.

The point is that it’s impossible to reason with people whose beliefs are based on faith, not fact.

Svendsen Sighting

It’s late morning in early November and Carl Svendsen is traveling Bernardston Road north on his way to a northern Greenfield tool show at Indoor Action, when something catches his eye at the Emerson family tree farm, near the outflow of Lover’s Lane. Upon closer inspection from a range of 100 yards, the long tail and massive body tells him he’s looking at a “dirty-blonde” cougar. Unbelievable.

Svendsen quickly turns his vehicle around and stops to get a better look as the cat as it “meanders” toward an open ridge-top behind pastured horses; clearly a large, long-tailed cat. No question about it. Then, overwhelmed by the sighting, he backs up quite a distance and into the landowner’s driveway. He has to share his sighting with someone; anyone. Why not the owner? So he exits the vehicle and raps on the door. A man answers and he askes him to come quickly, there’s a cougar walking across his pasture. But by the time he gets his shoes on and arrives at a site where they can view the clearing, the cat has vanished, likely on the other side of the western ridge, headed toward Interstate 91.

“Seeing is believing,” says Svendsen, of Erving. “There was no mistaking it. I’ve read about sightings, now I’ve had one, and to think it happened in Greenfield, Massachusetts. I’ve been all around the country and see my first cougar in Greenfield? Who would have thought it?

“I was so excited that the guy I spoke to must have thought I was having a heart attack. I was just thrilled to see one. A beautiful sight.”

The homeowner questions him. Is he certain he didn’t see his house cat?

No way. The thing was huge.

Svendsen goes home to get his wife, tells her to come with him, he’s seen a cougar. They jump in the car and take a walk to where he last saw the animal. Nothing. “I’m no tracker and the ground was hard,” he says, “but the landowner saw a track he wasn’t familiar with and said he’d check with a friend of his who’s a game warden. He also told me his neighbors from the other side of the power lines claim to have seen cougars.”

Several other sightings have come from the area west of I-91, between East Colrain and the Mohawk Trail, not far from the Emerson site.

What will the authorities say when a cougar is killed in the road? It could happen. And if it does, they’ll have a lot of explaining to do. Why do they say they’re extinct? Why don’t they admit there”s a chance, even slim, that they never faded into total extinction?

At this point Eastern Cougars are ghosts from the past, kind of like moose and wolves and lynxes, which have reappeared with the reforestation of New England. So, why not cougars?

That’s a question no one has been able to answer with certainty.

Tan Blur

Charlie McCracken of Greenfield sort of got lost in the shuffle, buried deep in my clogged Outlook Express Inbox, after coming forward with another Pioneer Valley cougar sighting. Upon receiving it, I read and red-flagged it, planning to revisit it in this space before it got buried.

”I always enjoy cougar-sighting articles and have to chuckle at the ‘disclaimers,”’ McCracken wrote, ”because I had one run in front of my service truck while delivering propane tanks to summer camps in the early 1990s at Damon Pond in Chesterfield/Goshen.”

The indelible impression was the long tail with a big ball of black fur at the end. In fact, because it all happened so fast, that’s all he saw clearly.

The way McCracken recollects it, he was delivering 100-pound tanks ”one bright, sunny afternoon in May” when a big, tan blur streaked in front of his Ford 350. He remembers thinking, ”Wow! That was a big dog or deer,” but it ran like a big cat and stood as high as the headlights on his one-ton truck. He knew then that the animal was much larger than his 80-pound dog.

”All I got a good look at was the big haunches and the long tail with a ball of black fur on it,” he wrote. ”It was no photo-op.”

He slowly got out of his truck to investigate the space between two summer camps where the cat ran, but it was gone.

Chalk it up as more fuel for the fire. Certainly not an acceptable sighting to wildlife experts, but still worth adding to the list of local folks with no reason to lie who think they’ve seen a cougar.

”Cougar sightings are nothing new around here,” a major Whately landowner and avid hunter who’s pushing 80 told me last week in his pasture. ”People have been reporting them for more than 60 years.”

And the authorities always have the same response: ”Eastern cougars are extinct.”

Maybe so.

Amherst/Hadley

First an old friend and new resident of Amherst who, on a fall afternoon in the car with her teenage son, saw a cougar cross the road in front of her on Northeast Street in Amherst. Then a sighting by another woman who spotted a cougar out the window of her Mount Warner Road home in North Hadley. Barbara Breuer says she was speaking to her husband, Matthew, on the phone when she got a good side view of the big cat running parallel to the road, then an eyeful from the rear before it disappeared. Mount Warner Road is not five miles from the Northeast Street sighting; certainly close enough to stir suspicion.

“I know it was no poodle,” she joked. “It had the tail of a cougar and the movement of a big cat.”

Breuer, who grew up in the Berkshires and is familiar with wildlife sightings, said she was stunned by what she saw, having never heard of cougars in the region. But now she’s convinced they’re here, despite what “the authorities” say.

Because Matthew Breuer thought the public should be aware that a big cat is lurking, he called the Daily Hampshire Gazette in Northampton. He was concerned it could be a public-safety issue for hikers, joggers or trick-or-treaters. So, the sighting was brought to light Friday in a Gazette story headlined “Big cat in Hadley…cougar?”

The story had legs. “I’ve already had two calls from women who have also seen a cougar locally,” Breuer said. “One was in North Amherst, so it could have been the same animal. She told me (state authorities) confirmed the presence of a cougar not long ago at the Quabbin through scat analysis but refuse to acknowledge the possibility that they’re here.

“Why do they deny it?” she asked. “Do you know why? It seems strange to me.”

I told the curious, articulate lady that I’ve heard one interesting theory related to endangered species and development or logging rights, but had no definitive answer. The fact is that I, too, wonder why wildlife officials refuse to admit the possibility that cougars are re-emerging in reforested New England, despite a growing number of credible eyewitnesses who swear they’ve seen them.

If the big cats are, indeed, on the comeback trail, it’s only a matter of time before one winds up dead on the side of the road. Even Doubting-Thomas wildlife experts admit that.

It could happen.

Acton Cat

Yes, it’s old news but still worth sharing because of recurring themes from previous cougar sightings; and this one even includes a police department that believed its eyes, was convinced a big cat was lurking, one that presented potential danger.

The town was Acton, about a half-hour northwest of Boston, the date Nov. 8, 2004. You’ve got to hear this one. It’s a doozey.

Shortly after 1 a.m. on that fall date, the police received a call from a concerned resident who was hearing surreal noises in the woods behind his home in a residential neighborhood. The report claimed something was growling, something that didn’t sound inviting or common. So two police officers responded to the scene, turned their engines off, exited their vehicles and listened. It didn’t take long, perhaps two minutes, before they heard loud, threatening growls from the woodlot. Then they heard the leaves on the forest floor rustling, twigs snapping and — bingo! — a “mountain lion” popped out into the open, soon followed by a mature whitetail buck estimated at 200-plus pounds, large set of antlers pointed down menacingly toward the predator.

“Apparently, the buck and cat had a standoff in the woods,” said Acton Police Chief Frank Widmayer, “then the buck chased the cat out of the woods. My officers saw it clearly in the light from their headlights and a street lamp. It was only 25 or 30 yards away.”

The police report from both officers described the animal as a large tan cat, five to six feet long, up to two feet high at the shoulders. There is no mention of a long tail in either report, which may or may not be significant, but the chief does recall his officers telling him they saw the tail. It’s true that not all cougar sightings include descriptions of a long tail, but most do; it all depends on the angle of the sighting. But tail or no tail in the police report, both officers believed they had seen a cougar. In fact, so convinced were they that the department posted an illuminated, flashing sign to warn people of a potentially dangerous situation.

The officers reported their sighting on the radio to a state Environmental Police Officer, who advised them to leave the scene and he’d investigate in the morning. He did and turned up nothing. But the EPO wasn’t the only interested party who took it upon himself to “look around.” A local woodsman also took a walk, camera in hand, and came away with photos in living color of what appeared to be cat tracks in the mud a quarter-mile from the police sighting. Then, many subsequent calls about big-cat sightings came into the station, the first some 19 hours after the police sighting, when a woman saw what she described as a mountain lion behind a dumpster. Two days later, shortly after 10 p.m., another “mountain lion” was reported by a supervisor at the Hartz Corp. in Acton; the man also saw his cat behind dumpsters. Then two more reported sightings in four or five days, one just after 11 p.m., the other just after midnight; all nighttime sightings, which is not surprising because cougars have nocturnal tenancies.

Aware that there had been many cougar sightings in nearby Westford, that just a day or two before his officers had witnessed one with their own eyes, and that a friend in a coffee shop had flagged him down to tell him about the cougar that had crossed in front of his car just prior to the police sighting, Widmayer thought it was time to take action.

“I’m no expert on tracks but they didn’t look like dog tracks to me and I showed the pictures to people who said there were definitely cat tracks,” said Widmayer. “The guy who took the pictures also said they were cat tracks.”

Widmayer took the necessary measures to alert his townspeople of the potential danger and it didn’t take long before the story hit the Boston TV-newscasts — reporters, lights, cameras, microphones, the whole shebang, a wild scene; “mountain lion on the loose in Acton; be alert, protect you pets and livestock.”

Widmayer e-mailed the photos around and showed them to the investigating EPO, who viewed them with interest, then told the print media they were canine tracks, an assessment he curiously hadn’t shared with Widmayer.

“I was actually surprised when I read that,” Widmayer said, “because I didn’t remember him saying that to me.”

Hmmmm? Imagine that.

Cat tracks are wider and rounder than those of canines and don’t display claw marks because cats walk with their claws retracted. The EPO who viewed Widmayer’s photos based his “opinion” that they had been made by a coyote on one indentation in the mud that he identified as a claw mark. But careful observation reveals that the indentation could be unrelated to the paw print.

So, do you suppose there’s an edict from the highest level of authority to deny a potential re-emergence of Eastern cougars? Is the first responsibility of wildlife officials to squash such rumors, deny the possibility of mountain lions? Who knows? But don’t discount it. It may be real. No matter how credible the source, how convincing the evidence, the authorities do indeed refuse to admit there’s the slightest chance Eastern cougars are back. The official, often-repeated response is that “Eastern cougars have been extinct for 100 years.”

End of story.

Of course, that was the same “official response” wildlife officials routinely uttered three and more decades ago, when people started seeing Florida panthers in the Sunshine State. Today the “extinct” panthers are back, alive and well, reproducing in the dense Florida swamps. The obvious question, one New England officials must answer, is: How can they be certain Eastern cougars were ever extinct? Could there not have been one here and there in remote wilderness back when three quarters of New England was clear-cut? Could the big cats not be coming back now that the deep forests have returned throughout the Northeast?

Never say never — that’s my mantra — and needed support can come from the people who experienced the Florida panther phenomenon three and four decades ago.

“All I know is that two of my officers saw that cat with their own eyes from close range,” Widmayer said. “How can I question that?”

Perhaps he should ask the experts. They’ll have an answer for him. You know how it goes: Eastern cougars are extinct.

Sounds good … but certainly not undisputable.

Like Chipmunks

Seems I can’t get away from cougars, mountain lions, catamounts, pumas or whatever you want to call them.

The reports keep coming at me like the Connecticut River Coordinator’s office wishes Atlantic salmon were migrating up the valley. Thse days, there seems to be a flurry of big-cat sightings along the Montague/Leverett, MA., line, Sawmill River country between Dry Hill Road and Cranberry Pond. I’m not making it up. Three reports in less than a week. What can I say?

Believable reports? Who knows? I can only report what I hear if I judge it credible. Myself, no, I have never seen a cougar. Sometimes I wonder what I have started, because since the first mention of the subject more than two years ago, I have been besieged, swallowed by the whale of visual evidence, which is, of course, unacceptable to the authorities.

“Seems to be quite a few around,” laughed Montague Chief of Police and old softball buddy Ray Zukowski on the phone, “kinda like chipmunks, I guess.”

You’d think so judging from the number of reports

Anyway, the Montague sightings started with an outdoorsman from Chestnut Hill. He called to inform me that two lady friends had seen a cougar cross their path while walking up the wooded Dry Hill Road a day or two earlier. Several attempts to reach one of the witnesses by phone have been unsuccessful, although she did leave a message on my phone confirming the sighting. Then, while still in the process of playing phone tag, another man from Chestnut Hill sent an e-mail to describe a sighting by his fiancé “on Leverett Road along the Sawmill River,” just before dark. So impressed was this witness that she immediately contacted the man who alerted me, then they returned to the scene the next morning looking for tracks through fresh snow.

“The fact that she was willing to wade into a marsh-like area to look for tracks in 20-degree weather,” was all my source needed to know about the veracity of her report. New to the area by way of Holyoke and totally unfamiliar with mycolumn, he posted the sighting on MassLive’s outdoor forum and immediately got a hit from someone who’d recently seen a cougar near Cranberry Pond. Throw in the report that came my way from nearby Dry Hill Road, along with the fact that none of the reporters were aware of others’ sightings, and it’s worth mentioning, regardless of what my critics say.

So, there it is: more reports by people who haven’t followed my weekly column and have no apparent reason to lie. All I can say is take it for what it’s worth. No more, no less. In the meantime, I’ll play the fool and wait for vindication.

Mad Meg theme designed by BrokenCrust for WordPress © | Top