Petersham Cougar Confirmation

Although it seems like old news by now, really, it’s not that old. Plus, there’s an exciting new “breaking” element, which, frankly, is not all that surprising.

First, a little background. On the morning of June 28, 2016, Petersham horse owner Anne Marie Zukowski went out to feed her 16-year-old German Hanoverian named Summit and was immediately suspicious that something wasn’t right when the horse was in the wrong stall. Upon closer inspection, she found deep, ugly claw-mark gouges on the horse’s shoulder, then blood and hair around stable and barnyard. She pondered possible culprits and thought, “Gee, could it have been a mountain lion?”

Hmmmm? Scary indeed.

Concerned about her horse’s well-being, Zukowski brought him for medical treatment to the Tufts University animal hospital and alerted law-enforcement officials to her problem. Among the agencies to visit the site and review the evidence were police, game wardens and MassWildlife, which concluded that her horse had injured itself by rushing through a gate and catching a shoulder on its open latch. Furious at what she interpreted as an insulting,  condescending, clueless hypothesis, and with the resources to pay for independent analysis, she gathered blood and hair samples left on the scene and sealed them in a plastic bag. Then she searched for a reputable lab to identify the animal that had left the biological calling cards around her stables.

The samples wound up at the University of Florida at Gainsville’s Maples Center for Forensic Medicine, which tested them and determined in November that they had been left by a cougar or mountain lion or puma or whatever you choose to call it. The long and the short of this finding was that her horse had not been attacked by a bear, a big bobcat or a sharp, open gate latch. No sir. It was a mountain lion, rare indeed in these parts, with females and thus reproductive populations said to be extinct east of the Mississippi River. Some question that assessment.

When MassWildlife officials criticized Zukowski’s method of specimen collection and said they knew nothing of the lab she had used and thus had issues with the finding, she grew more incensed and felt disrespected. At that point, a watchdog group called “Cougars of the Valley,” which investigates New England cougar sightings and the sites of reported incidents like Zukowski’s, jumped in, paying to send what was left of the biological materials in Florida to Melanie Culver, one of the nation’s most respected cougar researchers. When MassWildlife officials claimed they were unfamiliar with Ms. Culver as well, Cougars of the Valley spokesman Ray Weber begged to differ. MassWildlife had sent 1990s Quabbin scat samples to Culver’s Arizona lab, which ruled they had been left by a cougar.

Stationed at the University of Arizona, Culver is an assistant Wildlife and Fisheries Science professor in the School of Natural Resources and the Environment, and assistant leader of the Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. Her Culver Lab there analyzed Zukowski’s biological data and confirmed the University of Florida’s findings. Yes, that’s right, the Petersham horse had been attacked by a cougar. Not only that, but a cougar of North American origin. So, howdya like them apples, Ant Martha?

Culver took it a step farther that the Florida lab by identifying the cougar’s gender. It was a male, which may have come as a disappointment to Weber, who was heard wondering aloud on the phone one day what would happen if the beast turned out to be a female, far east of where there are said to be none.

“Can you imagine the reaction of wildlife officials if the Arizona lab finds that the cougar was female?” he enthusiastically asked in June, after the Arizona lab had blood and hair samples in hand. “Wouldn’t that be something, considering officials’ total refusal to admit the possibility that cougars are coming back, and that some of the reported New England sightings are real?”

Well, although the Petersham cat was a male, how long do you suppose it’ll take for a female to make an appearance in Great Lakes country or expansive ranges like the Adirondacks, Catskills, Poconos, Green and White Mountains? Or how about the Berkshires and Appalachians, or even Conway or Colrain? Some say it’s impossible, that too many cougars are killed under liberal hunting quotas in Western states like the Dakotas and Montana, which produce wandering dispersers from overpopulated habitats. Then you have overzealous law-enforcement officers in Minnesota or Illinois or Iowa, who shoot first and ask questions later, killing cougars in the name of public safety before they get close to the Eastern Seaboard. But don’t forget that wayward males have already found their way here, including the first confirmed case killed on a Milford, Conn., highway on June 11, 2011, just weeks after the United States Fish and Wildlife Service declared Eastern cougars extinct instead of endangered. Now this in Petersham. What’s next? Fact is, Northeastern cougar rewildling is looking more and more possible, perhaps even probable, as the years pass and the forests continue to grow —  no matter how long the odds, what the chorus of detractors says or how loud they scream it.

In the meantime, there’s still loose ends in Arizona. Culver, a Ph.D geneticist, is trying to match the Petersham cougar’s DNA to samples in a national database. She’ll likely soon know what gene pool this big cat came from. Is it a North Dakota cat? South Dakota? Montana? Idaho? How interesting!

Remember when that Milford, Conn., cat was killed by a motorist and the initial response from state and federal wildlife officials was that it was probably a released pet that had been set free after growing too big and dangerous to care for. Examination and biological analysis proved that skeptical knee-jerk opinion to be dead wrong. Not only did that 3-year-old, 140-pound male disperser hail from the Black Hills of South Dakota, it had traveled 2,000 miles in just less than two years, depositing a documented DNA trail through Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and New York before meeting his maker in the evening shadows of New York City. The Petersham cat likely followed a similar path and is possibly still lurking somewhere in the Norhteastern neighborhood.

After months of anxious anticipation, Weber finally alerted me to Culver’s finding last Thursday afternoon by email. I had eagerly awaited the Arizona lab’s confirmation all summer and had checked with Weber several times in an effort to stay in front of the story. When I placed a follow-up phone call to Weber Thursday, I was concerned to learn he had forwarded Culver’s findings to MassWildlife, which has from the start tried to discredit the story with its familiar deny-and-distract song and dance routine. Knowing from experience that the state agency doesn’t like to acknowledge the presence of cougars, I gambled, figuring they’d rather sweep it under the rug than make a media splash.

Well, now the cat’s out of the bag, so to speak. There’s no denying that a cougar attacked a horse in the Quabbin community of Petersham. At this point, I’m not sure what intrigues me more — the cat’s gene pool or the state’s impending response.

Stay tuned. It could get humorous.

Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.
Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

9 Responses to Petersham Cougar Confirmation

  1. Helen McGinnis

    “This makes the third confirmation in Massachusetts since 1997.” What is the 2nd confirmation-the Quabbin skull? It’s hard to believe there is a population at Quabbin. If there was, it should be relatively easy to document. Females with kittens can’t move far. Is Matunuk the RI confirmation? How was the evidence covered up?

  2. Since there were follicles, its a pretty good assumption the blood was from the horse ripping the cat’s hair out by the roots, which would bleed.

  3. The blood and hair were actually found on a wooden fence near the latch. The DNA lab instructed the owner on how to remove it for testing, and she followed the directions and sent it off. One sample was hair, the other blood. The blood was in a piece of wood that was chipped off. It was verified after that the piece came from that spot, and some additional blood remained. The hair was pulled out by the roots, so follicles were present for a clean test. That also indicates the hair was ripped out, probably by the horse. The environmental and local police investigated and do not dispute the material, nor the owners account. They could see where the wood sample came from. The fact that it was cougar was somewhat a surprise. The owner was told the horse was NOT attacked, and that it injured itself, which she did not believe. (Another incident just like this one in CT 30 miles away). She sent the hair off (color brown, her horse is black), and just asked to ID what animal attacked. The results surprised everyone. Again there were TWO samples tested, one blood, the other hair. Both tested as Cougar. The state and federal wildlife were informed and kept appraised, and agreed on the lab to do the second verifying test. I don’t think anyone can dispute Melanie Culver. Further testing in progress to ID what population the DNA is from. This makes the third confirmation in Massachusetts since 1997. You can dispute sightings, and the accounts from pro hunters back to the 1940s all you like, but DNA isn’t disputable. There obviously are a few here in the state, or at the least moving through. The confirmation in Rhode Island, and the subsequent investigation by the environmental police there, (Matanuck), clearly show there is a least in some of the states an attempt to hide evidence. May not be the case here, but it is happening.

  4. Fair enough, Helen. However, I assume a large hose could do damage to a cougar. I would also suspect there are cases of cougars being injured in attacks on horses, be they wild of domestic. No?

  5. Helen McGinnis

    The cougar must have been injured rather severely to have left blood (and whatever, wherever). No sign of it since then, I guess. As you probably know, accounts of assumed attacks on adult horses are more common in areas where no cougar populations occur. If cougars have existed continuously in some place in New England, I guess it would be the Quabbin area. But I will remain skeptical. It’s too bad MassWildlife wasn’t there when the samples were collected for DNA analysis.

    One well documented individual that came from the Black Hills doesn’t shatter the myth.

  6. I’m surprised that you and Chris are so quick to criticize claims like this. I don’t know that the hair and blood came from a latch. Did I write that? Seems to me she collected it from wooden fence, the ground, elsewhere and sent it to Florida lab, which sent what was left to Culver’s lab. This woman isn’t some crackpot trying to create a hoax. She just wanted an honest effort to determine what visited her corral and injured her horse. Irate at her treatment by state officials, she took it upon herself at her expense to do what had to be done. Then Cougars of the Valley footed the bill for the followup. I must have misread you people many years ago. I always thought you were looking for honest answers about cougar dispersers, not trying to deny any possibility that these animals could pass through the Northeast. Wasn’t that myth shattered on the Milford CT highway?

  7. How to you know that the blood and hair sample was actually collected from the latch? Did you see her do it? It’s extremely rare for cougars to attack full grown horses. The cougar must have been injured.

  8. Yes, Erik, and more of the same every step of the way from wildlife officials. Still, silence. The response should be interesting once the media picks up on it.

  9. Erik

    Interesting!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Mad Meg theme designed by BrokenCrust for WordPress © | Top